If the chrono-seconds hand is left running as a permanent timekeeping-seconds hand, then it would also lead to the chrono-minute hand and the chrono-hour hand ( in the sub dial at 6' O clock) running continuously. This leads to the following questions
1. Does this have an effect on the power reserve of 55 hours stated ( is this without the chrono running).
2. What is the impact on the accuracy of time-keeping itself as a result of the chrono-seconds being used as a time-keeping seconds permanently since this will engage the chronograph also.
3. Will the watch perform better when the chrono-seconds is resting ( without it being operated as a chrono or as a permanently running time-keeping seconds) ?
4. What is the risk of mechanical wear and tear to the watch as we are now dealing with a permanently running chrono along with normal timekeeping. I appreciate that the rotor is winding around zirconium ball bearings etc and that very little lubrication is needed. It still does not take away the level of wear and tear on the parts overall if the wearer chooses the option of a permanently running seconds hand.
regds. narsi