Volvok
1
Considering my first Patek : the 5059R or 5159R
After many weeks of hesitation I think I need some suggestion from others. Some of my friends(most of them already owns many PPs and collect for over 10 years) said to me that 5059R is the classic PP RETROGRADE with good dial, they think 5159 is too complicated and they don't like the thin elongated Romans number. And they think PP COMPANY just try to follow the market and try to enlarge the size but lost perfect balance do 5059, but they use the same movement. Others said (some of them are AD, friends don't understand much about the watch) I should buy a bigger size(36mm is too small nowadays ) and the 5159R's dial is even more beautiful and delicate. For me, MY wrist is not so big, so 5059R looks ok and good to me, and is cheaper to me!! (Since my friend will sell his 5059R to me which is in very good condition) Can any one give me more advise of these two watch 5059R vs 5159R?! I don't want to be regret after 5-8 years, since it is too small. Thanks for sharing some of your thoughts and maybe some wristshots would be awesome. Jacky
This message has been edited by Volvok on 2014-03-18 19:12:20
Considering my first Patek : the 5059R or 5159R
After many weeks of hesitation I think I need some suggestion from others. Some of my friends(most of them already owns many PPs and collect for over 10 years) said to me that 5059R is the classic PP RETROGRADE with good dial, they think 5159 is too compl...
5059 no question...
I used to own a 5059. It was my first PP PC. The 36mm case is offset by the 'hamburger' height. The dial is far cleaner and the retrograde date is an AWESOME complication. The 5159 doesn't look as clean. I equate the two to the difference between a rolex ...
5059 for me
I do not like the hands or long Romans on the 5159. That said, I prefer the 5050 to both of these by a mile.
my preference
In my opinion, for this movement / complication, I like the 5050 > 5059. Not the newer models as stated by others.
I bought the 5059, even after all the same responses
But I think Patek is a very very careful firm when it comes to meddling. Maybe 5159R is better.
5059
If its not small on your wrist then go for it. They made the 5159 for people with bigger wrists and lost something in translation. The 5059 is much nicer dial wise in my opinion. Good luck making your decision. Sincerely H.
5159 if...
..you are not looking for an exclusively dress watch...5059 in my opinion is more exclusively suited for dress occassions while 5159 is more all rounder making more of a presence..I like the absolutely gorgeous central dial pattern on 5159 and the more pr...
5059 5159
I also prefer 5059 to 5159. First I don't have large wrists, so I don't need a bigger version (I don't mind a bigger 5059 though) - the watch just sits perfectly on my wrist. Second, the dial of 5159 is just too busy. The hands, the sunburst dial, the elo...
I am clearly in a minority but....
First of all, either watch is a fantastic choice, but I love this line for many reasons. Retrograde date, hunter caseback, I absolutely love both of these watches... but.. I love the 5159. I actually disagree regarding cleanliness of the dial - the thinne...
5059R
The 5059R was my first PP Grand Complication. I was sorry to let it go, but a vintage Panerai came along which I had to buy. I find the dial on the replacement 5159 too "busy", with too much unnecessary "decoration" which detracts from the aesthetic appea...
5059r or 5159r
both are beautiful. rose gold is warm & inviting. choose what sings to your hearts desire. best geross
"MY wrist is not so big" and therefore ...
I would recommend the Ref. 5059, based on the size and the pictures I saw from the watches on your wrist. Different people have different wrists and of course different tastes, but when it comes to watches I think they have to please my wrist first. It he...
Just glancing at both on your wrist, I prefer the size of the 5059.
Cosmetics are an individual choice but the 5159 appears to be somewhat overwhelming on your arm. I have a relatively small wrist compared to the rest of me and some of the now, standard size watches are too large for me. Conveying a "look at what I have" ...
5119R or better 5160R: because time is money
As much as vintage Pateks are tempting: after 20 years of age you will be given an estimated service cost. I have not any experiences with estimated service costs from Patek but it sounds a bit expensive. I would buy the current versions always as they ar...
smaller size
clearly works better on you. Having said that the newer version has more charm to me than the older. I am a big fan of small watches. If you note movement sizes they are prettty much standard size parts and average about 31mm. Thus, all these 40-45mm watc...
5159R
Prefer the newer version dial, especially the center sunburst pattern, both are great watch to have, Good Luck and welcome to the Patek Family. This is contagious, once you have your 1st Patek, more will follow, are you ready !!!!
5159G
after seeing the 5059R in person last weekend, I would chose the 5159G. The larger case and dial makes reading so much easier. If I really have to pick the 5059, then it will have to be the white gold version. Al lthe best and let us know your decision. C...
5159 is the one
You cannot go wrong with any of these beauties, but IMHO the 5159 fits even better than the 5059. Reasons: the elongated Roman numerals look refined, extremely elegant yet classy. Actually, I know few watches that do such a great job with the Roman numera...
Tough choice
but for your wrist size, definitely the 5059. When ensuring if the watch is a good fit for one's wrist, the size of the watch is naturally important but another factor that many of us tend to ignore is the way the lugs are formed. Looking at the photos, t...
After seeing your photos, my vote is...
...5059 because it fits your wrist much better The 5150 just looks too large for you unfortunately because the sunburst dial is very lovely Good luck with your decision and let us know what you decide Cheers, Gordon