russell996
1470
I believe the differentiator with Patek finishing is if the piece has been through first and second mounting.
My understanding is that this first and second mounting process only applies to split second Chrono, minute repeaters, tourbillon etc. This is also the cutoff for servicing at the factory where PCC and below can be serviced at various sites around the world.
This extra level of finishing is visible under a good loupe and for instance there are some excellent photos around on the web showing 5170=5270<5370 even though the base calibre is the same.
I am not 100%
By: nwk00 : July 28th, 2019-23:29
But I am sure they do. Think I saw some macros of the repeaters and the finishing is good. I would assume it applies to the split sec chrono as well. I am only uncertain where they decide certain price points warrants additional finishing.
Patek Philippe at least...
By: lascases : July 28th, 2019-23:23
... hand finished all pieces until 2005 or so. That is well documented in official material. I have no reliable information regarding current production but would assume hand finishing as well. In doubt just buy the excellent pieces porduced before 2000/2...
very detalied, thanks.
By: KLC8 : July 29th, 2019-01:18
what do you find finished level from 3939, 5078 compare to philip dufour? don't know if Patek highest standard can up against Dufour?, I agree that well made watch is from all the aspect, and finishing level is not the only judgement.
You are absolutely right.
By: Grisar : July 29th, 2019-06:14
I basically regard non-automated finishing by applying electric hand tools as "hand finishing". Maybe there are still some pure hand finish procedures by applying some small tools in very very exceptional occasions, but basically (almost all) movements ar...