kkwn98
84
I like both, but would go for the 3940...
... all day long. The words that immediately came to mind when I saw the pictures of each one in your post were "elegant" (3940) and "cluttered" (5140).
To me, the 3940 is one of the great Patek designs and definitely one of the most beautiful modern era perpetual calendars out there. Hence, it boggled my mind when I saw the limited re-issue 3940 at the Grand Exhibition in London, with a salmon coloured dial (stunning) but 5140 configuration (huh?).
Regards
For the fun: Patek 3940 or 5140?
3940P: A summit of understatement ( not to say coldness ), elegance, discretion. For a mature taste: 5140P: Cooler, easier, a tad bigger, but maybe less... refined? Which one do you prefer? Aaah, in both case... Same movement... Cal 240 inside. Worth a ph...
I may be biased, but maybe not...
Since I own both references. My preference goes to the older model, but find the blue-dialed 5140P stands in a league of its own. I'd even choose that over a 5550P (and I have). I think it has to do with the strong contrasts present in this watch. The blu...
I can also be called biased...
but after looking enough 5140P and 5550P side-by-side, my favourite is 5550. The reason is that on a long run 5140P is a bit "boring". At first sight(s) it is really cool but it lacks the capability to attract again and again. When comparing 5140 with 394...
+1. The problem, when a watch gives you an easier feeling is that you get quickly rid of
It... Often. Best, Nicolas
At the same time
5550P is so different that you lear to appreciate it more and more, time after time. The old 3940 is nor easy or complicated. It's just pure and in that, it's the purity I appreciate. Best, Kari
Since everyone seems to like the 3940...
Here's the rose gold version in the sunshine... ...
Very nice.
Even coloured gold is not my first option, in the case of 3940 the R version is perhaps the nicest. Best, Kari
I don't know why that last image is so skewed.
The original size is 1024x758 pixels. I linked the image (did not use the uploader) so you can open the image in a new window and view it properly. For some reason it displays funny when I view it on the forum.
I know from my very own experience
that 3940R looks much better on the wrist than in any photos taken. However, your pictures are great and give a good hint... Congrats! Kari
This is an interesting comparision
I've prepared a post about the 5140R mainly but which makes the link with the 3940 reference. I really like both (especially the upsize for the 5140) but one thing I prefer from the 3940 is the subdials' printings (again!) which are lighter and more elega...
I like the concave bezel of the 3940
(and don't underestimate the difficulty of making those). Overall, if I had to make the decision each morning whether to wear my 3940 or my 5140, I would not find it too upsetting.
That is indeed the kind of nice dilemma we all want to live. ;) Back to these...
... The concave bezel is more my taste, too. More sophisticated, more sensual, maybe, too? Best, Nicolas
Both will do. Hard choice.
But 3940 g is more refined. Discreet and really a statement watch. The 5140 g j or even p slightly more sporty. My opinion. Thanks for the pics nico. Best Geross
3940..The only problem is
the dial is too busy and not clear,you feel its out of focus. Best, ahmed
The 3940 is my favourite.....
less cluttered which suits this watch better in my opinion. Nice pictures mate;) Cheers Francois
The 3940 is a nice experience to live. Even for a few minutes.
Thanks for your feedback, my dear friend. Nicolas
My vote goes to 3940
Everything seemed perfectly harmonized and balanced on the 3940. A case of less is more that give rise to the elegant and timeless appeal. One never gets tire of looking at the sublime dial. In additon to what other Purists have already pointed out on the...
3940... no contest
basically for the font spacing! Never really thought about the concave vs convex, but that is a good point! Best, Ross
Yes, a dial thought for the case and a case thought for the dial. Same for the 5110
Compared to the 5130. Best, Nicolas
Agree here too
I had my heart set on 5130g. Then tried the 5110g on for kicks. No contest, 5110 was more elegant and had better spacing/proportions
First series, wow! They are becomming hard to find.
So balanced and beautiful. I love the vintage aesthetic of this version. Well done!
I like both, but would go for the 3940...
... all day long. The words that immediately came to mind when I saw the pictures of each one in your post were "elegant" (3940) and "cluttered" (5140). To me, the 3940 is one of the great Patek designs and definitely one of the most beautiful modern era ...
As always, you are right!
Thanks very much for your original post and for giving us all the opportunity to air our thoughts. The 2015 "gimmick", as you say, does not, I fear, do justice to an iconic watch and modern classic. The two watches show, very clearly, the differences betw...
We'll see. We have to give time to the new CEO. I didn't like the 2015 Re Editions, though
That reminded me a certain italian brand re launching some Out Of Range pieces. Which is not the best way to keep the faitfhul lovers of the brand. Best, Nicolas
I have an absolute love / respect for all what is visible
under the 3940 glass, a reference, for my taste. Well, the case shape is not my cup of tea... I can only dream about this 3940 dial on a 5196 case: it would be something that could make me do anything crazy! Can't say the same for the 5140... the date in ...
Simply put……….
The 3940 In the past I have worn both of these models, but the 5140, only stayed for a short period, whereas the 3940 remained a lot, lot longer. For me the dial on the 5140 was just too cluttered and difficult to read, especially the date sub dial. Thoug...
Now we need a new thread about the merits of the different series!
Thats definitely a more technical debate :)
A simple solution...
...as the very happy owner of the 2015 salmon 3940.....see other thread on this where I (attempt to) analyse that piece: 3940 elements, 5140 elements and some completely unique elements. So this is a 3 way choice: 3940, 5140, or 3940 of 2015 (apparently a...
3940, always - and I am hunting for one!
I almost got a 5038 recently. But even though it was very nice and rare with its fantastic black dial, I just did not like the pearls on the bezel. Small things can spoil a beauty, I guess. And that is my issue with the 5140: just a bit off from true grea...
3940 Sotheby's
Anatol There is a rather nice one in the catalogue for the next Sotheby\'s Auction in London. Take a look - and laugh at the silly thing they say about the differences (or not) between 3940 and 5140.
You see... The Advanced Research on the moonphase subdial is tasteless, imo.
That is something you would not see with a 3940! Best, Nicolas
Beautiful picture
The watch is stunning, and nice picture off the stern of the ship! Aloha
Was absent for a few days, I missed that one but...
I suppose you know my answer ;-))) Needless to say that my vote goes for 3940, and specially the P or the R versions. The P has a wonderful dial, slightly brushed (a bit like 5235 regulator but less brushed), thus giving a lot of life to the dial, much mo...
I had 3940j, 3940g, 5140g all at the same time
though I didn't own any pt version of any so I could safely say my choice is definitely the 3940 in whatever metal. Mech
Mech, the pictures of yours over the years were inspirational
And among the reasons why I grew so attracted to the 3940!