amanico
[JLC Moderator]
402934
I tend to agree with you, only if we compare both of them. [nt]
No message body
Patek 3417 / Jaeger Lecoultre E 168. Amagnetic Versus Amagnetic and Chronometer.
These 2 are legends for those who collect amagnetic and or manual winding chronometers. Two signatures, " amagnetic " and " Chronomètre ". Two great brands, Patek and Jaeger. Two great references as well. The Geophysic has the advantage of being ALSO a...
your post gives me chance to ask...
How did their amagnetic properties compare? Geophysic 1958 tribute has 600 gauss protection (less than the modern milgauss, but I do not know what the original rolex milgauss was, but it was not 1000 gauss either!), which I believe is same as the original...
Two great watches with two totally different price points now. Vintage Patek's continue to command a different rate of growth to other manufacturers and I have often wondered why this is,
especially considering that JLC one made the movements for all of the holy trinity..
Those dials and especially the way the names are printed are quite unique
They have this charm I like a lot and they are definitely models that find a nice place in a collection of both brands. Thanks for the pics Nicolas. Best, Mark
side by side
These tool watches are becoming very desirable!! 3417 vs 666 I have not seen the geophysic irl ...
Yes macho , very manly watch. The 2.
The Patek calatrava more refined and quite versatile. While the Jaeger will be more sporty and less formal not very versatile compared to the calatrava. My opinion. Best. Geross.
Divine Duo!!
to own one is a real blessing. having the chance to own both is... beyond spectacular. thanks for sharing these beauties here
I think they're both stunning. I love the lugs and the Bauhaus feel of the Patek. But as a JLC fanatic, geophysic occupies an elevated, unique place in my heat and imagination.
That being said, I remember when Baron first posted after getting the amagnetic Patek. What a watch!
