mec
48
Less is More
I had the opportunity to purchase either the 5711 or 5712, both in SS. Although I appreciate the complications of the 5712, I found that the simplicity of the 5711 made for a more elegant "sports" watch. To me, the asymmetrical dials interrupt the harmony of the steel bracelet and the case; furthermore, the cushion dial of the 5711 shimmers in the light, whereas that of the 5712 is mostly obscured by the subdials. I may be in the minority here, but I do believe that the distinction between these two watches proves the old adage that sometimes less is more. Fear not, however; you cannot go wrong with whichever one you choose. Good luck!
Available on the marketplace
Nautilus....5711 vs 5712
Which Nautilus do you prefer 5711 or 5712.... Simple dial or moon dial? Thanks Cheers
5712 for me too..
much more interesting dial and that amazing 240 based movement with the micro-rotor. -s
This is a question that I've asked myself...
I like the 5711 for its simplicity, and its allegiance to the original model that debuted in 1972. However, the 5712 does speak to me as well; although I don't like the overall idea of the moonphase, date, power reserve, and small seconds (I think this is...
+1
I agree with you in most of the points. To get them both would be heaven & hell for me, as there are just too many interesting watches out there and I don´t want to stock safe queens. Tough decisions are part of the fun, aren´t they
5712
I have the 5712G and it's a great watch. I also wanted simple and got an Aquanaut 5167.
Since I like both I added one
I like the 5711/1 the best in pictures and may still get one one day, I had the chance to see and try on a 5712/1 and it hit me that the asymetrical dial is MAGICAL!!, Its had me captivated for 27 hrs, lol. The way the light shimmers off the dial and sub ...
5712
I love the asymmetric layout of the complications. For me it is not pretty but it is interesting and I have not tired of it! Jon
No doubt, 5712.
I am on it, indeed. Time and patience........................oh yes, and money. I tried the 5711 last week and it's a very nice watch but, too clean for me. I need those little red dots of the power reserve indicator, the moon and the stars to brighten up...
5711
I'll be the odd one and express my preference for the simplicity of the 5711. I agree that the 5712 has its points but I find the complications to be not particularly useful to me personally. I just find the cleaner dial and simplicity to the 5711 to be m...
Less is More
I had the opportunity to purchase either the 5711 or 5712, both in SS. Although I appreciate the complications of the 5712, I found that the simplicity of the 5711 made for a more elegant "sports" watch. To me, the asymmetrical dials interrupt the harmony...
Non-owner, but I prefer the 5711.
The 5712--I've had it on a number of times--is more engaging and lively, though I find the simplicity of the 5711 to be soothing. While trying on both, I asked my wife her opinion. She suggested it would be bold to wear the 5711 and consider it enough. So...
The best answer here is 5980
That is the most desirable Nautilus IMHO, in regard to aesthetics, movement, and function. And with prices relatively depressed at the moment, it may also be the best value. 240 movement of the 5712 is certainly nice, but not much to brag about, especiall...
5712
Personally, I find the 5711 to be a little too 'austere' for a Nautilus, which is a dressy and sporty watch at the same time. Some may feel that a style and shape like the Nautilus is a statement in itself and enough to carry the trademark guilloche dial ...
How much "spirit" was ther in the beginning?
They didn't have moons on the 1st jumbo.
Right you are
I didn't mean to debase the original design of the Nautilus when I said 'spirit', I meant it as how I perceive the watch as it looks and the impressions that it embodies today, ie in direct comparison if the 5711 and 5712.
Simplicity is more coherent for the style and history of the Nautilus.
But the 5712 is so beautiful... Fr.Xavier
5712 dial with 5711 movement
I'm not sure if its just me but every 240 movement watch I've ever owned did not wind well on the wrist. I just started to think of them as manual winders, not that I mind because its a pleasure to wind but that my small complaint for the day
So thats why the power reserve is there
To warn of the need for winding! I've heard others say the same thing about the efficiency of the power reserve.
5712...
by a narrow margin and ONLY because it is unique in its presentation of the different complications. In comparison with other time only watch with steel bracelet, 5711 is almost the acme, at least looks-wise.
5711!
I just picked up the 5711 last Friday... love it! I was considering the 5711, 5712, and 5980 but decided to go with the simple dial...
Thank you all....
for your responses...... both are truly gorgeous watches...... I appreciate your input and opinions...... 5712 seems to be the favourite.... cheers
5711 or 5980 for me
Funny I just saw this thread I have been debating this in my head for a week. I love the simplicity of the 5711, but the 5980 is what grabs me, The 5712 dial is too buys IMO.
