lee.boston01
1
Patek 3970 PT
I just looked at a 3970 PT sold in 1999 with black dial and baton markers. I was surprized that the only place a PT950 hallmark was found was on the solid case back and deployant buckle. The hallmarks on the lugs were crisp but no identifiable PT950. Is this standard for the model?
A 3970 question
By: dab : January 16th, 2010-08:32
Hi every one .. this is the second time i post here.. the first time i enquired about a 5970 that i was going to purchase but i ended up buying a Rolex Big Crown :- P ,, but this time NO Rolex its definitely a patek 3970 ,i came across two UNBELIEVABLY at...
Good estimate!
By: johnngym : January 16th, 2010-15:27
Hi Arthur, Thanks for giving us your study regarding 3970! Actually as far as I know the latest movement number of 3970 is "304755X". So I guess that at least 4,550pieces of 27-70Q were produced. If 90% of this particular movement were used for 3970, the ...
WOW Arthur!!
By: dab : January 17th, 2010-11:04
what a great article!!! THANK YOU truly for all the Help and now i can say i made up my mined and its going to be the 3970R its my first non rolex watch in my collection and i am soooooooo exited i will definitely Post scans as soon as i get it,, Best Reg...
Patek 3970 PT
By: lee.boston01 : April 28th, 2010-12:35
I just looked at a 3970 PT sold in 1999 with black dial and baton markers. I was surprized that the only place a PT950 hallmark was found was on the solid case back and deployant buckle. The hallmarks on the lugs were crisp but no identifiable PT950. Is t...