small-luxury-world[Patek]
8725
Probably not, but the same could happen ...
if you take away the logo/brand of quite a few vintage pieces from UN, VC, GP, UG and so on.
I agree, the 5032 Millenium is quite different and not common for PP - at least on the first view, but if we look in detail ...

Well, I was aware that not everybody would like that piece and I thought it could be an interesting discussion anyway 
Cordially,
Oliver
ps: It´s all about the details.
lovely ref
By: cisco : January 26th, 2015-09:44
Beautiful case reminding of old references 2551/2525/3433 and I think some other(s) , nice dial, even if the 2 is surprising. The ruby is really unusual, I don't know if I like it, Overall a true Beauty, remained quite unknown thanks for sharing
Tough question
By: cisco : January 29th, 2015-06:53
personnality or classicism, normally I go to eprsonnality but the ruby is not my stuff. And These Kind of romantic shape in White Gold are terrific... so I would rather go conservative for once thanks for adding Images ;) François
Not my piece of cake
By: dedestexhes : January 26th, 2015-10:41
Reminds me of a mix of a vintage Patek with some Breguet sauce on top of it... However that 2597 (or at least I think it is), for me one of the all time top 10 of Patek. If money would not be an issue....that would be my next Patek. Thx for sharing these ...
Odd ball.
By: TheMadDruid : January 26th, 2015-12:46
Actually, the word "weird" came to mind. That's probably just the Jersey in me speaking out loud. But odd ball, for a Patek. I could see this as another brand's watch-not sure who. Keep on looking at it and I start to notice little details that I like ver...
not my cup of tea!!
By: abe : January 26th, 2015-14:15
the single breguet numeral "2" looks odd to say the least; the cabochon on the crown is so Cartier; just my $0.02 did it come with a solid case back? Thanks for sharing; very interesting piece indeed; a real oddity from Patek
100% agree.....
By: Baron - Mr Red : January 29th, 2015-04:11
.....i love discussions like this....and we all differ in tastes....the beauty about "taste" is that there is no definitional correct.....taste is personal. Thats why we can differ without any issue. I once read a great quote.... "we are all entitled to o...
Just my opinion...
By: secretlife : January 29th, 2015-18:52
I couldn't help thinking after I read your comment: If you took the name off the dial, nobody would even give it a second look; it's only interesting because it's "so not Patek" Personally, I don't think it is a very attractive design with or without the ...
I'm with you on this one!
By: secretlife : March 4th, 2015-18:36
I think an "unsigned Calatrava" would be an exquisite thing to have! Since my last post I have also identified the Sarpaneva "emali" as another watch that I fell in love with first then realised later that it had an unsigned dial... Also deserving of spec...