The Aquanaut has always been a bit of a mystery to me …
I remember when it was first introduced in the 1990s and a highly respected watch commentator and Patek aficionado (who will remain nameless) described it as a “wart”. Apparently even Patek at the beginning wasn’t sure if it was part of the Nautilus line ...
I must confess that I much prefer it to the Nautilus.
Especially the first version: Credit: AVW ...
I may be in the minority here but
I have absolutely no love for the Nautilus in any iteration, it simply is not my "cup of tea" so to speak. Now when it come to the Aquanaut I would take one in a heart beat, the travel time version especially but any would suit me just fine.
In the minority, yes, but my impression is that it is a substantial minority. If you don’t mind my asking …
What do you find so appealing about the Aquanaut and conversely so unappealing about the Nautilus?
I like the Aquanaut because it does not have an integrated bracelet, that is something I strongly dislike
on a watch and I actually find the Nautilus very visually unappealing. I like Girard Perregaux but don't care for the Laureto for the same reason.
One Aqua for me - nice but not perfect
After ordering the 5088p two years ago I immediately started to read thoroughly through the catalogue and stopped at the 5968A with its orange details. After being shown one in the metal I ordered it as well and it was the first PP that I received. I like...
5088P and 5968A, seem to be a perfect set of complimentary watches. Each so different from the other and beautiful in
their own unique way. Fantastic photo of 5968A. Hope to be offered one someday and your photo makes me want it all the more.
Congratulations 🍾
Now that only NYC is carrying this, it’s good to see they are still making these 😅 Yes I do agree Aquanauts are very cool and easy to wear.
In the 25 years of collecting
I have never owned nor had any desire to buy one. I always felt they looked a little “cheap” thought the dial was blah and never liked the rubber strap. Just not for me- I have two friends who just love theirs- one is an MD and bought it for himself as he...
Thank you so much for your fantastic and detailed reply!! Exactly what I was hoping for.
Your reply covers many reasons why a lot of people might be totally turned off by the Aquanaut. On the other hand, happy to hear how much you like it’s sibling, the Nautilus.
Completely understand you!
A watch is desire able and appealing to me when, in addition to many other things such as design, technology, history and philosophy behind it, it has two main features: wearing comfort and functionality. The Aquanaut is super comfortable to wear, very ac...
Thomas, thank you so much for taking the time to share in detail your perspective about the Aquanaut. And more generally for
describing what elements are important and appealing to you in considering the purchase of a watch. Unless I am mistaken looks like you have the RG version of 5164, which I think is extremely attractive. Glad you are enjoying your 5164.
Great post Patekova because you made interesting points & posed meaningful questions !
IMO it was great how Patek pulled off a derivative of the Nautilus and made it a successful line on its own. Aquanaut is very similar in shape with Nautilus and yet so different. To me, the feel and looks of the rubber strap magnify the differences betwee...
Gordon, thanks so much for your kind words. However, I must disagree with you. You are IMHO definitely not a “simple” guy….
I would say you are a “modest” guy and being modest and self effacing you describe yourself as a simple guy 😊👍
just picked my aquanaut and it's just so comfortable. I love time only watches because I never end up using the complications anyway
so I chose the 5167. Personally the precious metal aquanauts are beautiful but I prefer the lightness of the SS ones.
