KamalRostov
1789
Ah! So the image of the sky is captured clearly on the water's surface then?
This reminds me of a advert made for a motoring launch sometime back. It was documented that the photographer was on location for several days trying to get that perfect shot. It was also said that the water needed to be so still that it mimicked a mirror...
No, they are right way up
I\'m not sure about the order ... is that what you mean? The moon was more visible in the water than in the sky. Mike
Ah! So the image of the sky is captured clearly on the water's surface then?
This reminds me of a advert made for a motoring launch sometime back. It was documented that the photographer was on location for several days trying to get that perfect shot. It was also said that the water needed to be so still that it mimicked a mirror...
Thanks for the suggestions
I only have my iPad for "editing" sitting a hotel chair - I\'ll try again when I get home. Cheers, Mike
Of these three...
I prefer the second photo because of the darker sky & water. In my opinion the third photo suffers a bit because the we don't see the source of the reflection... it works but there's a bit of an incompleteness (IMO). All three could benefit from some ...
Second one as well. For much the same reasons...
Also as ongopt notes, the tonality works better, even if the third one might technically be more "properly" exposed. A great example of the role of the photographer and choices over algorithms...
The middle one!
The darker tones allows the eye to travel further back into the photo creating a greater sense of depth. Nice!