Dchang81
772
I wanted a Leica years ago. I don't know it was just people being haters, but I remember a few telling me that these days there's not an appreciable difference.
This was about 10 years ago, but I also remember comparisons between examples of photos from several cameras. Posters could not pick out the Leica shots vs a canon or Nikon or sony. Reminds me a bit of audiophile forums where some posters claim a massive difference when there is no measurable frequency response change. Then again I do think there is value if you enjoy it, and it compels you to use it. I feel like it's more important to get a setup that you will actually use, with ergonomics/feel etc. I view it like my turntable. I don't necessarily think it sounds better than cds with occasional pops and occasional speed issues, but I do enjoy using it so it's worth it to me. My 2 worthless cents.
Q vs M
By: DocAbe : December 18th, 2024-18:53
I have both and love them a lot; M has been my go to camera for creativity, versatility and value retention along with world class quality M lenses!! However Q has become my “weapon of choice “ for travel due to its compactness and superb versatile featur...
I think you‘re right.
By: mrds : December 18th, 2024-19:14
Most probably technology has converged and there is no huge difference between a Canon and a Leica. However, this is not very important for me. Even if a Nikon was a slightly better camera, what matters to me most is that I love to use the camera and that...
What you can't do with iPhone
By: LK : December 18th, 2024-20:20
If you want what an iPhone can't do, consider medium format, specifically the Fujifilm GFX series. However, your list of requirements seems like it would be better served by two cameras than one. Street photography, travel, portraits, and landscapes are p...
Thanks LK.
By: mrds : December 18th, 2024-21:11
I hope that if I leave out the rare portrait I can cover the other stuff with one camera. Medium format probably would limit the times I actually carry the camera with me, so I guess something like a X100VI or a Q3 would be a good starting point.
Chalk & Cheese
By: le_chef : December 18th, 2024-21:10
I have a Q3 28 and I keep considering an M. The M is totally different and will not give you the same success rate as a Qx. You also have to consider the OVF with a manual rangefinder mechanism is harder to master than an EVF with autofocus. Your best bet...
I agree with Blansky
By: cazalea : December 18th, 2024-21:58
I use a Sony RX10 Mk iv and I chose it because it has a reasonable close up 24mm and long reach zoom @ 600mm, quick focus for action shots. It’s not too heavy or large, and has a non-removable lens. I can operate zoom, stills, movies, etc. with one hand (...
Many thanks, cazalea!
By: mrds : December 19th, 2024-09:42
You hit it spot on that today’s more serious zoom cameras are incredibly versatile, and at the fraction of the cost of, say, an M system. To me it is more important to engage with a scene or picture in a different way than I do using the iPhone. And that ...