Jurry
6103
Thank you so much
Yes I’m shooting RAW and in post I noticed that toying around with WB had a big impact.
The issue I was struggling with most is the following:
* literature I studied all indicate that you’ve got to try and get in as much light as possible this they advocate long exposure and shoot wide open.
* I used a f/2.8 Z lens
* I used the 500 rule thus Max exposure to prevent star trailing is 500:24= Max exposure approx 20 sec
* ISO: start at 3,000 and experiment
But when I used those settings all I got was plain sand color type flat photo. Only when I bumped iso back to 400 and exposure to 10-13 sec could I see some stars.
Somehow that doesn’t make sense
Night photography
By: Jurry : March 18th, 2021-12:56
After several attempts and having read many articles on settings fir astro-photography finally a photo that’s “presentable” It’s far away from those Milky Way photos but if you realize that I shot this one from my back garden and only handful stars visibl...
Thanks
By: Jurry : March 19th, 2021-01:18
This one was aperture f/2.8, 70 mm, shutter 13 seconds and ISO 400 I quickly learned that the 2 most important determining factors are ISO and WB (which I hadn’t expected) In post editing working with WB had huge impact The sensor is full frame 26 MP whic...
Nice shot !
By: Horological_addict : March 20th, 2021-02:09
Hello Jurry, May i make some comments. ISO and aperture are important factors. If you shoot RAW (must be for astrophotography), it doesn't matter your WB as you can easily change it in post as you mentioned. But you can't change your ISO and aperture once...
Thank you so much
By: Jurry : March 20th, 2021-03:33
Yes I’m shooting RAW and in post I noticed that toying around with WB had a big impact. The issue I was struggling with most is the following: * literature I studied all indicate that you’ve got to try and get in as much light as possible this they advoca...