Allen
1851
Great comments in your article, Dario.
I remember someone saying that there were only 3 V1s made due to the difficulty of adjusting them to work consistently. While talking to Fabrice Deschanel of R&P, he mentioned that the reason they modified the V1 to V2 is to improve on the reliability. There seems to be significantly more reliable v2s out there and if they ever make a V3, it would be even more reliable. We will see if Richard decides to keep making the 004 or not, but I definitely agree that it's not a very profitable watch for them.
Hi Andrew!
By: Scaramanga : February 10th, 2009-04:41
Well, I am afraid the RM004v2 has made me withdraw a "little" from the watch market for a while. Right now it still is my "grail" watch. Even after all this time... 99% of my wrist time can be divided between my UR-103.05 and my RoyalOak "Jumbo". All the ...
Thanks Allen!
By: Scaramanga : February 11th, 2009-01:22
Im am glad you are still with your v1, despite you thinking it was a bit too heavy. I will have you know that although "theoretically" the v2 is improved over the v1, your v1 is even more complex and has more parts than a v2. From behind the v1s are even ...
No doubts here...
By: Allen : February 10th, 2009-11:36
I personally believe after talking to many watchmakers that the CLASSICAL rattrapante movement is second only to the minute repeater complication in difficulty to make and adjust. The tourbillon looks simple compared with it. Patek has priced their ref 59...
Thanks Dario...
By: Rob : February 12th, 2009-12:23
and pretty much to the rest of the guys. Makes me realize that missing out on the RM 004 V2 ti when it was being offered to me before as probably the closest thing to THE oversight of my watch life. Oh well. One can always still dream. Thanks again for th...