Chris Agostino
103
Interesting question...
After seeing the line up from SIHH I started wondering what was going to happen to the RM010.
As a proud owner of a 10, I really like the balance of the dial better than the 29 and the 30. I understand the desire to move forward with movement designs, and there is no question that the movements in both the 29 and 30 are an advancement from the RM005S movement in the RM010, but from a purely aesthetic standpoint, I still like the 10 better.
Without knowing the prices of the 29 and 30, it would be hard to say if they are designed to replace the RM010, but I feel that with Richard's desire to do in-house movements the life of the RM010 might be coming to an end.
Chris
which RM model should retire?
i mean other tha the limited productions such as theRM001,006,009,012,18,027,038 we have the other stream production watches (the 5 already retired) the 10,11,16,004,008,002,003,14,15 are candidates of retirement just as URWERK did with the 103 and MB&F w...
Interesting question...
After seeing the line up from SIHH I started wondering what was going to happen to the RM010. As a proud owner of a 10, I really like the balance of the dial better than the 29 and the 30. I understand the desire to move forward with movement designs, and...
I don't think that if the RM10 is discontinued would be due to in-house mvmnt
As both the 29 and 30 even the 11 16 and 23 are all based on voucher movements and not in-house What about the high end ultra complicated modems are they considered in-house? They are made by R&P aren't they? Although I personally consider RM as an integr...
Well lets just retire a winder design
Why oh why does the 10/38/002/004 etc etc etc still have a winder that looks like an afterhtought?..looks like an old nut with a bit of old rubber chucked around it. Yes I admit it suits some cases quite well...looks ok on a titanium 002 for example, but ...