@Patek_Ambassador
814
It seems like the RM016 is chock full of RM DNA and would be far more desirable than its low price on the secondary market suggests. [nt]
No message body
RM016 desirability and issues
I have been looking at used RM016 and am wondering why exactly are these the most inexpensive RM’s on the used market and why they don’t hold their value? By all accounts it looks like any other very nice RM so why is this particular reference so inexpens...
I guess squared watches aren’t that popular among collectors.
But with RM its a bit different as there round watches (RM 32/33/28 etc) aren’t popular as well imho . Not a RM owner so maybe a RM collector has got a better explanation !
First, a word of caution
It always makes me shudder whenever anyone describes a watch - any watch - as “inexpensive” without categorically stating what they mean is “relatively inexpensive” compared to other pieces. Always remember that what someone deems as expensive or inexpens...
I did a review sometime ago..
Click on the link if you like to read my humble opinion.. www.watchprosite.com
I own an RM016
I purchased it for several reasons. Over the past 3-5 years I have noticed that the secondary prices of RM's have risen significantly (including the 016). I had several watches I was NOT wearing, so I sold them and put the funds into an RM016 which I now ...
I own a RM 016 too
Like PP James I also bought an 016 and I like him I traded in/sold several watches that I was not wearing to fund buying the 016. I love it. It gets regular rotation. It is unmistakably a RM but it’s under the radar, easy to wear, and really a perfect cas...