benjomd
10
16750
I was wondering why they are priced the same if they are in equal condition, I guess personally I would go for the 16750 even of you add a bit more on the price. Just my 2 cents
Rolex GMT
By: seb : February 10th, 2010-00:44
I am about to buy a Rolex GMT, I am choosing between two references: the 16750 from 1984 and the 16700 from 1999. I have been offered to buy these watches for GBP 3250 each. Which one would you buy and why? Both are in a very good condition. 16700 16750 B...
Vintage
By: seb : February 10th, 2010-09:48
Thank you Nicolas! It feels kind of wrong to buy a 25 year old watch for the same price as the 5 year olds are selling for. But I guess that's what you have to do to get the charm of a vintage.
WRONG???
By: amanico : February 10th, 2010-14:01
No way! The 16 750 is already a collector, compared to the 16 700. It is a transitional model, much rarer than the next GMTs. It is more expensive, and that is logical, to me. And that's nothing. When you'll " attack " the Vintage Subs, it is even worst! ...
Depends..
By: hans_jorgen_1968 : February 10th, 2010-10:16
...Hi SEB, warmly welcome to the best watch forum around Buy them both, or the one you feel best about wearing. If you would have asked me 1 year back, would I have said why purchase a second hand one, purchase a new watch! Now I would probably be "yaeing...
My collection
By: seb : February 10th, 2010-13:40
Today my collection consists of a "new" Rolex Daytona with white dial which I bought two years ago and a more vintage Omega Speedmaster that my dad purchased the year I was born. I use the Daytona way more than the Speedmaster but I don't know if this is ...
Nice ...
By: amanico : February 12th, 2010-09:40
I'd go for the 1675... It would have been different if the 26750 had the painted indexes, instead of the circled. But in this case, I would prefer this 2675, even if the case has been polished. Best, Nicolas