WatchProSite
|
Market
|
Digest
WatchProSite
|
Market
|
Digest
Market
Digest
About us
Moderator Team
Terms of conduct
Privacy Policy
Contact us
Patron Circle
Sponsorship/Advertising
Rolex
Search all forums
Only threads
With images
aperna
17097
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
Antique prints by FA Seguy [nt]
Mar 11, 2020,16:00 PM -
18 comments
-
X
No message body
login to reply
18 Comments
view entire thread
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
SD 4000
By: aperna : March 11th, 2020-15:45
I prefer this reference over the submariner due to the lack of the cyclops. Thanks for looking, best regards, Tony ...
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
Yeah baby, no cyclops! π [nt]
By: India Whiskey Charlie : March 11th, 2020-15:53
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
My favorite Sea Dweller. Big regrets not buying this piece back in November 2016!
By: patrick_y : March 11th, 2020-15:57
I was offered this piece in November 2016, now I regret not buying it!
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
What's in the background? [nt]
By: patrick_y : March 11th, 2020-15:58
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
Antique prints by FA Seguy [nt]
By: aperna : March 11th, 2020-16:00
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
Ahh. They're lovely. [nt]
By: patrick_y : March 11th, 2020-16:01
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
I definitely prefer to the sub..
By: myles721 : March 11th, 2020-16:11
hate the cyclops...meets ISO standards..
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
I agree without the Cyclops. I love mine.π [nt]
By: BeckyJax1 : March 11th, 2020-16:41
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
One of my favorite Rolex, I love mine dearly. [nt]
By: ZSHSZ : March 11th, 2020-17:43
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
flawless
By: Gelato Monster : March 11th, 2020-18:44
without rolex folliculitis
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
don't you mean cyclopulitis? haha! [nt]
By: Kniazukay : March 11th, 2020-19:39
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
In the case SD4000 an acute Cyclopulitis π€£ππ€£ [nt]
By: Gelato Monster : March 11th, 2020-23:30
The rest of rolex is more of chronic Cyclopulitis
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
LOL! [nt]
By: amanico : March 12th, 2020-00:10
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
Love this reference! I have one as well and I agree I prefer it to the sub [nt]
By: Kniazukay : March 11th, 2020-19:38
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
A classic. And I think I prefer the SD to the Sub, as well. [nt]
By: amanico : March 11th, 2020-23:58
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
I also love mine. It is the best SD reference imho and by accident a very rare one too. What more can we ask for? π [nt]
By: agyzace : March 12th, 2020-00:50
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
Completely agree. Also sits better on the wrist for some reason I found. [nt]
By: Millhoose : March 12th, 2020-03:39
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
I recall AD sold the last model with a high discount rate after it was discontinued..
By: jonrus : March 12th, 2020-19:16
βTo make room for the SD43β in the display case after Basel show! How times have changed!
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
I still prefer the 114060: No cyclop as well, but a lower case than the SD.
By: jkvs : March 15th, 2020-12:20
The 114060 sits better on smaller wrists. Nevertheless, the last 40-mm-SD is a historical Rolex watch: It houses a movement that was the first to be tested under the new Rolex in-house-criterias.
login to reply
Cancel
Options
Watermark images
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Gray
Light Gray
Display images as:
large images
normal images
small images
thumbnail images
Place caption text:
after images
before images
Done
Search
Done
Upload
Image Uploader
Click to pick or
drag images here