amanico
[JLC Moderator]
402127
No, I'd rather prefer going for a black dialed 16520. [nt]
No message body
Sunday Picture: Rolex Daytona 16520 from 1997.
A classic, an icon, and, in my opinion, at least, one of the nicest Daytona ever made. Best, Nicolas ...
Don't remember seeing you with this one!
Great watch for sure and a very harmonious iteration
The more time goes by the better this one gets
With every new Daytona release I like this one more and more Cheers D
The 16520 is a silent Legend, its true worth not yet recognised
Probably one of the mist historically important Rolex In the same laegue as 1680 red, 1665 double red etc His and a more recent hers Thanks for sharing your 16520! Best Imran ...
wow nice
Zenith daytona! I love those panda rings, my 116520 says hi :3 .. sad now that they are discontinued! no more steel bezel Daytonas! ...
Great ones.
I had the opportunity to play with one a while back. Not sure it is the same ref, but it had a Zenith movement. ...
Yep. I had the 116520 black dial, too. But I swapped for the 16520.
In fact, I first owned a 16520 white, then swapped for the 116520 black, and swapped again for the 16520 white. With the idea to also get a black dialed 16520. Best, Nicolas
I like mine so much that
I treated it to an overhaul at Rolex Hong Kong. Full set white dial from 1996. Wish I could go back in time and buy more at the 3120 GBP sticker price on its box. ...
Yes indeed!
Very harmonious dial, thinner indexes and hands; dark grayish sub-dials with the inscription of Daytona in red. I couldn't agree more.
Right again.
Sorry, yes the sub-dials are black. Best regards and blessings. Also for me the best Daytona ever.
Definitely one of the best versions.....
I like the slim black subdials, the next version with silver subdials didn't 'pop' for me. I'll bring my new one to compare when we meet my friend Andy. ...
Wonderful piece
Still restrained dimensions Is it any slimmer than the more modern versions?