amanico
[JLC Moderator]
401479
Photogenic for sure. Highly photogenic, even. I much prefer a good old 1675, 6542, 1655 or Tudor 7924, too.
Rolex Daytona Paul Newman 6239.
A watch I saw a couple of months ago, in Paris. The " Djinn Shot ". )) I always had mixed feelings about the Pail Newman. Cool to see, but on my wrist, not that thrilling, strangely. And you always have a fear that it is not totally original, unless if th...
This is a real one! Unlike the 90% fakes out there
I agree though On the wrist I don’t see the hype on this, its more a status symbol a vintage equivalent of Richard Mille
Years ago I tried on the PN
It's a photogenic watch, Actually, it doesn't matter if its PN or just 6265/3. The case is high, like the Tudors of today, but "acceptable" cause it's a PN... That real or not thing, is true. like the DRSD, there are more reds then white 1665,,, The watch...
Stunning photos as always, and what a Daytona!
For me provenance is everything particularly with timepieces such as this (but I would also argue even from those in the more affordable luxury ranges too - mid 4 figures and lower 5 figures).