myles721
5110
Yes…
Mar 22, 2024,14:13 PM
I was thinking of the latest one. 50 mm way too big…it’s not IMO a record breaker if you have to strap a giant hunk of metal to your wrist but the Cameron does fall within my “spec” 😅🤣
Comments:
view entire thread
Rolex Sea-Dweller 16660.
By: amanico : March 19th, 2024-22:07
Another shot of this marvelous transitional reference. There is not much better than this one, in terms of Sea Dwellers.. The James Cameron, I like it a lot, and it is one of my targets, but not above this one. Maybe a Double Red MK II??? Best, Nicolas ...
+1
By: amanico : March 20th, 2024-08:15
Incredible reference
By: imrootbeer7 : March 20th, 2024-07:12
particularly with matte dial. It was interesting that this and the 1665 featured together in the early 1980s Oyster booklet that came with the watches.
De rien!
By: amanico : March 23rd, 2024-04:57
The best Rolex diver…
By: myles721 : March 20th, 2024-10:59
The thing about the James Cameron …my cutoff is 45mm x 18mm …once you go bigger than that as far as I’m concerned it’s a “device” not a wristwatch. They start to look absurd for every day wear. The 1200m is perfect.
Yes…
By: myles721 : March 22nd, 2024-14:13
I was thinking of the latest one. 50 mm way too big…it’s not IMO a record breaker if you have to strap a giant hunk of metal to your wrist but the Cameron does fall within my “spec” 😅🤣