sham1
9624
Very nice!
33m is a great size and will suit many people depending on the lugs, the thin bezel and if the face is minimal which will make it wear large like this beauty. Thanks for sharing!
A Seiko for Padj - the SCVL002 6810-8000
As discussed with Padj in another thread, simplicity certainly has an appeal all of its own (here: www.watchprosite.com for thread). So I thought of offering a Seiko proponent of this school of thought - namely my Seiko SCVL002, also known as the ...
That's pretty & simple
Can he tolerate the combination of two positive virtues? This is the simplest Seiko I have. MIke ...
I am sure he can :)
Remember when you got it - cool piece! What’s the reference again?
LOL - Sham :)
Surprising really how normal 33mm wears if the proportions are right And the watch has Seiko‘s thinnest mechanical movement - the 1,98mm Cal. 6810A. Glad you like it
Very nice!
33m is a great size and will suit many people depending on the lugs, the thin bezel and if the face is minimal which will make it wear large like this beauty. Thanks for sharing!
Agree with you my friend. “Simplicity” watches are the best ones 😉
Best wishes Alkiro ...
THE Simplicity of Mr. Dufour 😉
Here the back side just for the pleasure. Best wishes Alkiro ...
Another beauty, Mr. K.
Thank you for thinking of me, and posting this one. I'd love to see your two- and three-hand collection in person. (Hint)
After making enquiries with my UK AD
I have been told that this lovely watch is a limited edition piece only for the Japanese market in conjunction with Seiko's 110th anniversary. You guys get all the best pieces and by the best I mean the smaller wearable ones!!
A piece from 1992...
Hence it takes some work to find one and Japan is of course your best bet
It was the time Seiko returned to mechanical watches...
In 1991 they re-launched the UTD (ultra thin dress) in a limited edition of 100 pieces with Seiko‘s thinnest Cal 6810A, mine and the SCVL001 (no Roman numerals) came a year later.
I see!
Unfortunately in the early 90s, my passion was for women and I was wearing a Timex! I have now grown wiser and discovered that watches cost a lot less
Beautiful Piece!
I have been searching for the 6810-0010 for over 5 years.... If anyone has one that they're willing to sell, please let me know