UN Dual Time vs. Vogard vs. Rolex GMT Master II
I am trying to decide between these 3 watches. I want a travel watch that I can wear while swimming and therefore want a metal bracelet, not rubber or leather. I also want it to be very easy to set the GMT or secondary time. What do you recommend and why?...
Hi John, I edited your post.
I edited your post to insert images in order that you get answers more easily. Between the two UN, I prefer the /91 because I find it more elegant: I like the way the second timezone is displayed on the UN. Fx ...
7/91
The second one is my preference because of a cleaner dial and more balanced looks that is equally comfortable in casual and formal settings. If I were to nitpick, the only thing I would change is to have a less shiny bracelet.
7/62 is my vote
The 7/91 is too conservative for me as a sports watch. The silver dial makes it too "boring" for me. The black dialed 7/62 is much more sporty and looks like it has some personality to it. Cheers, Anthony
A little late to the party but for my 2 cents I would choose the 7/91. UN, in my opinion,
makes the best travel watch. I have worn my GMT +/- almost everywhere I have traveled. It is user friendly, comfortable and mine is on a bracelet so I don't have to take it off in the water. It has stood up extremely well to the the rigors of travel. It i...
Among these 2 UN, I would go for the white dialed one.
But the choice is much tougher between this UN and the Rolex GMT Master. The U.N has, of course, with its 2 pushers, a more sophisticated approach of the GMT complication, while the Rolex is iconic. After all, isn't that Rolex which created the Time Zone ...
I used to own
the 7/91 Excellent watch, unfortunately is gone now. But is a very nice watch. I am actually considering the Executive dual time 18ct rg now. My problem is that I already have the Explorer II and don't know If I can justify both. ...