Dr No[Moderator Omega - Wristscan]
37503
Thank you, Marcus, for performing yet another . . .
. . . thorough and objective review. One can tell that your admiration for the whole doesn't prejudice your typical attention to detail.
One question: were there any frustrations experienced with setting time? Other variations of the subsidiary seconds version of the 2892 (like Omega's cal 2202, for instance) have hacking seconds, so I would assume this UN iteration is similarly equipped. (That could be viewed as a marketing reason for the nominal 'chronometer' badging; not a chronometer per se, but merely designating a movement easily capable of measuring time.)
In any case, the absence of meaningfully placed minute markers would seem to make time setting a bit of a chore. Or, are the minute markers accurately placed on the dial?
Cordially,
Art
Setting issues ...
By: Marcus Hanke : September 2nd, 2012-03:57
Thank you for your compliments, Art, and your question, of course: Indeed, it is a bit difficult to exactly set the correct time due to the oversized hour markers and missing minute markers as a consequence. For example: It is easy to accurately set the t...
No skid marks ...
By: Marcus Hanke : September 4th, 2012-01:26
The rubber leaves no traces on the contacted surfaces. However, thinking of it, I never had any traces from the many rubber straps I had and have as well. However, they would not come into similarly sharp contact with hard surfaces as the edges of the wat...