anon438
429
If you asked 12 US experts at that time...
The list won't be the same that's most probably right, but the top 3 would stay as it is.
And that those expert employed by the Consumers Union of U.S. has no experience and no standards is certainly wrong. Do you have any experience in this institution? You should know it became one of the most reputed world wide.
Moreover I won't agree that this list is 'completely' wrong, that's just your subjective opinion - nothing else.
My personal summary
By: anon438 : September 29th, 2019-06:01
Some of you wonder about the brands listed, - it's explainable other stated it's no more relevant or would look different today, - that's true others put the Consumers Union publishing irrelevant at all. - what's pointless For me as a vintage aficionado i...
Not to forget
By: anon438 : September 29th, 2019-07:13
Read the whole article first, then come up with your opinion about it. Probably some very useful information for the normal consumer in it - if we think about 1949, very well state of the art in consumer information. Or could you spot any point of importa...
Content of the article
By: anon438 : September 29th, 2019-21:06
- Pocket vs. wrist watches - Swiss vs American made - Need of jeweles - Need of adjustments - Quality of watch cases - Other watch features: Stop-watches, self-winding, waterproof, shock-resistant, non-magnetic - Prices, taxes, tariffs - Tips on watch car...
Perspective
By: Jurry : October 4th, 2019-03:38
Probably not smart to jump in a discussion like this but can’t resist to do so. I belief one should place the 1949 survey in the context of that time: - there was no widespread distribution of knowledge as we know today - automatic watches were unreliable...
No Discussion Jurry
By: anon438 : October 4th, 2019-05:14
I don't think there was a discussion, not at all. For a discussion you need educated and well informed people. What I recognize in internet are manly opinions, more often sliding into hate speak if you don't agree with the ultra limited point of view of t...