if only the base data compared,
obviously some differences appear:
significant difference in
parts (935 - 727)
significant difference in function VC e.g.
Minute Repeater, 'security functions', manual winding for striking,
rotating bezel strike mode selection - GF e.g. 'security functions +
5', auto winding for striking, Tourbillon
Now you focus on 5
parts of 727 part movement and compare it to a 935 parts movent, what
result you could get?
It is possible to come up with the conclusion
one of the movements is more or less innovative? Certainly not.
It
is possible to identify a close technical concept? Certainly not.
Not
to talk about the difference in functions, they are executed all with different
designs.
What about the rest of the 722 or 935 parts, do they
not matter?
The only similarity in concept you can see obviously
is the location of the striking mechanism - it would be interesting
to know, who has had the idea initially.
Even the parts are
not interchangeable, as you maybe recognised, that's only one of the
most important development targets nowadays.