WHL[VC Moderator]
4922
Thank you, Robin.....
I hope you can get to Watches and Wonders again this year. I expect VC will have some fantastic releases for that event.
Bill
Great review, Bill
By: 4Js : May 1st, 2014-13:07
I know a lot of work went into this post I echo your comment about the watch riding. My 1952 is still not comfortable to wear. I have worn it at least 10 times since I got it, and I had it on last Sunday. I had it on with a short sleeve shirt. I still was...
Thanks for this Toledo Review
By: respo : May 2nd, 2014-06:27
I had not considered that the Toledo has had a long and interesting history. There have been a number of iterations of this watch, almost as if it were a product line unto itself, not quite the way the 1972 evolved, but certainly more of a history than mo...
Thanks Bill!
By: yesjb : May 7th, 2014-08:13
A very interesting survey with some great pics. The 42100 should be in there as well, I think (or did I miss it ?) I really like the layout on the 1951. It lacks nothing. The 42100 has a similar layout but i think a bit smaller size. The little date windo...
Thank you, Joseph....
By: WHL : May 7th, 2014-10:41
I did get the 42100 in there with the series of 1990's pieces. The date on it doesn't bother me, but the smaller size is not to my taste, though if I had been buying in 1998 it wouldn't have bothered me! This new Toledo 1951 is fantastic. Bill
Thanks BIll
By: yesjb : May 7th, 2014-15:40
I found it. I think the 1951 is what the 42100 should have been, beautiful central guilloché, attractive numerals and indices, a gorgeous case and a VC movement. Best, Joseph