WatchProSite|Market|Digest
WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Vacheron Constantin

Thanks for this Toledo Review

 

I had not considered that the Toledo has had a long and interesting history. There have been a number of iterations of this watch, almost as if it were a product line unto itself, not quite the way the 1972 evolved, but certainly more of a history than most of the other Historiques models, except for the Chronometre Royal. 

Speaking of which, I wish VC would come out with a new CR at a price attainable for many more collectors and outside of the Historiques range, in other words a non-limited model for the precision enthusiasts.  Can you tell the CR is much on my mind lately? 

Back to the 1951. I love the dimensions of the new 1951 -- that is it is now thinner than the original.  The curves of the case are absolutely lovely.  But what got me the most from your post is that final shot of the open case revealing the caliber 2460 SC.  I simply love that movement. It is nice to see how VC is placing its calibers in the cases these days since the Geneva Seal changes went into effect.  Oh, and returning to my CR theme, we know that this movement can be revised into a chronometer-certified caliber.  ;-)  Just sayin'.

So, Bill, does the Toledo 1951 displace the American 1921 on your wish list? 

Best,

respo

  login to reply
Related Content
expand_more
1972 PrestigeAmerican 1921HistoriquesVacheron Constantin
💰210 Marketplace Listings for Vacheron Constantin›
 
18 Comments view entire thread 

In-depth Review: Vacheron Constantin Historiques Toledo 1951

 
By: WHL : April 30th, 2014-21:56
Vacheron Constantin has been making watches since 1755, and with over a quarter millennium of continuous production to its credit the brand constantly has to be mindful of its past while it pushes forward with new wristwatch designs. One avenue that the b...  

Thank you, Kunal....

 
By: WHL : May 3rd, 2014-06:37
A form case would help to round out your collection, no? :-) Bill

The Toledo 1951

 
By: jrwong23 (aka watchthebin) : May 1st, 2014-05:12
Is my favorite novelty at Watches and Wonders 2013. Love the dial and the curves on the case. I always wondered why the Historiques series are relatively pricier but guess that's because they are rarer as you mentioned. Thanks Bill for the wonderful revie... 

Robin, you are correct. They are pricier because they are made

 
By: kpk : May 1st, 2014-08:39
in lesser quantities in comparison to other VC's. However, at times I feel their prices are not so justified.

Thank you, Robin.....

 
By: WHL : May 3rd, 2014-06:38
I hope you can get to Watches and Wonders again this year. I expect VC will have some fantastic releases for that event. Bill

Great Review

 
By: bsbg : May 1st, 2014-05:37
The "curved square" is quite an interesting look. Thanks for taking the time to post this.

Thank you, Ken....

 
By: WHL : May 3rd, 2014-06:35
You should try it on your right wrist soon, don't you think? :-) Best, Bill

Great idea

 
By: bsbg : May 3rd, 2014-11:34
But the "no driving" thing has reduced my mobility somewhat, especially when my chauffeur takes the afternoon off to photograph wildflowers ;-)

Great review, Bill

 
By: 4Js : May 1st, 2014-13:07
I know a lot of work went into this post I echo your comment about the watch riding. My 1952 is still not comfortable to wear. I have worn it at least 10 times since I got it, and I had it on last Sunday. I had it on with a short sleeve shirt. I still was...  

Thank you for the wrist shot....

 
By: WHL : May 3rd, 2014-06:34
When you store the watch is it with the strap flat or curved (as if on a winder)? Once the strap broke in I was really happy with the way it sat on my wrist, and wonder if the same would be true for you. Bill

Thanks for this Toledo Review

 
By: respo : May 2nd, 2014-06:27
I had not considered that the Toledo has had a long and interesting history. There have been a number of iterations of this watch, almost as if it were a product line unto itself, not quite the way the 1972 evolved, but certainly more of a history than mo... 

A less expensive CR would be nice.....

 
By: WHL : May 3rd, 2014-06:31
though for that I think you'll really just have to seek one out in the vintage arena. A vintage CR is just as important to a vintage VC collection as a Cioccolatone would be! And yes, I would rather have the Toledo 1951 over the American 1921. Bill

Toledo vs 1921

 
By: BTWatchguy : May 4th, 2014-12:37
I have to say WHL I am not supprised at that. The 1921 may have a bit too much whimsy for. I on the other hand would love the '21.

It's not that I don't like whimsy...

 
By: WHL : May 7th, 2014-10:55
I think it can be an important aspect of a watch's design, and I still adore the 1921, but now the Toledo 1951 is tops on my Historiques list. And besides, don't you think all those curves are a little bit whimsical? :-) Bill

Thanks Bill!

 
By: yesjb : May 7th, 2014-08:13
A very interesting survey with some great pics. The 42100 should be in there as well, I think (or did I miss it ?) I really like the layout on the 1951. It lacks nothing. The 42100 has a similar layout but i think a bit smaller size. The little date windo... 

Thank you, Joseph....

 
By: WHL : May 7th, 2014-10:41
I did get the 42100 in there with the series of 1990's pieces. The date on it doesn't bother me, but the smaller size is not to my taste, though if I had been buying in 1998 it wouldn't have bothered me! This new Toledo 1951 is fantastic. Bill

Thanks BIll

 
By: yesjb : May 7th, 2014-15:40
I found it. I think the 1951 is what the 42100 should have been, beautiful central guilloché, attractive numerals and indices, a gorgeous case and a VC movement. Best, Joseph