WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Patek Philippe

 

Thank you Mark for such a comprehensive write-up!

 
 By: GLau : December 1st, 2016-09:02
The ascetics of this watch is great because it has been designed properly as you have described.

Furthermore, IMO 5930 is a reference that "makes sense" because the combination of the Worldtime function and chrono is logical. For example: A traveler might need to test measure his/her travel time between two upcoming meeting places in another city to ensure he/she can be on time. Additionally, a traveler might wish to measure the total travel time from the city of origin to the destination hotel (flight plus car ride thereafter).

Given the above, the issue for me is the 30 minute counter. You post explained why only 30 minutes was used. To me, it dilutes the reason why I think the combination "makes sense".

Overall, a good looking piece that should gain a fan base.

Cheers,

Gordon

The chrono is there because they can

 
 By: Patekphilippecollector : December 1st, 2016-09:55
I don't think a chrono has any use anymore and 30 min less so! Basically same price as a 5170 with a Worldtime thrown in

I had some chronos in the past (and still have)

 
 By: Mark in Paris : December 2nd, 2016-15:33
and I must say I nearly never use them. But, like many complications I must say that in the mean time I'm quite happy to have a chrono watch as well...

I imagine that, like most of the complications we like in watchmaking but don't use, it is sometimes more for the craftmanship, engineering solutions etc... than the real usefulness.

As you mentionned, the manual chronograph are a very appealing interpretation of the chrono function (though it is around 74K€ in Europe versus 67K€ for the 5930). I would consider personally more the style of the watch above the functions in this case but this is just me. The craftmanship and joy to look at a manual wound chrono is another story!

Cheers Karl,

Mark

I think indeed the aesthetics will seduce more and more as time goes by

 
 By: Mark in Paris : December 2nd, 2016-15:26
I had some thoughts about the chrono function and I came to the conclusion that it was impossible to come to a perfect solution, satisfying all the needs (except if we decide to allow the case to be a little bigger). I imagine this is the same with World Time and the evolving time zones etc...

Thank you for the nice compliments Gordon and for sharing your opinion on that novelty!

Cheers, Mark

Thank you

 
 By: coz : December 1st, 2016-11:20
Thank you for your analysis! Very interesting to read. I completely agree about the font on the subdial maybe better in person...

My pleasure Coz!

 
 By: Mark in Paris : December 2nd, 2016-15:36
It is a reference I had pleasure seeing in the metal (more than others from the catalogue I find less interesting even if more on the traditional side).

Thanks a lot for your kind words smile

Cheers, Mark

Great Review Mark Thanks for all the hard work

 
 By: watch-guy.com : December 1st, 2016-13:22
Personally I am not moved by this piece but agree that it needs to be seen in the flesh before making any decision
I feel that is really a put together- Patek thought which two complications can we throw together and make a "new " watch
It feels bit try hard
I reserve my final judgement until I can see and wear one on my writs
So far the best thing about this is the case!!
Julian

It is interesting to see how we feel concerning this reference sometimes

 
 By: Mark in Paris : December 2nd, 2016-15:41
the kind of "should I stay or should I go" thing :p

I think it is a reference that will lead to the wider evolution about wether we like it or love it (or not!).

Yes, the case is very interesting as confirmed imho with the 5230 that shares the same design.

Thanks for your kind comments about the review it's a real pleasure sharing it here and for your input Julian, nice to have feedback of everyone smile

Cheers, Mark

Load More Comments >>