Comments:
A new Split-Second Chronograph from Atelier de Chronometrie, hand made!
AdC makes bespoke watches without CNC machines. Now, they've announced a split-second chronograph! Look at the finishing! What do you think? Thanks to watchesbysjx for pictures, see their article for more:
watchesbysjx.com This one is in white gold.
watchesbysjx.com This one is in white gold.
I love split seconds! Dial looks gorgeous and the movement is interesting. Not sure if I like the case, though. And the height might be an Issue for me. [nt]
No message body
Looks like a really interesting (and well-executed) proposition, and at a very reasonable price for this complication. Thanks for sharing a typically nice article and pictures by SJX ;-) [nt]
No message body
The kind of watch that makes this hobby worthwhile...
I think this watch will be a legend in collector circles for years.
Things I love, specifically:
-The movement, for not only its finishing (especially the great steelwork, and tasteful combination of finishes), but also for the functional improvements made to the base ebauche (not the least of which is the in-house free-sprung balance).
-The case, for not only its proportions but also its execution (high-Palladium WG and great finishing).
-The dial, which calls to mind my favorite vintage chronos from Longines.
Sadly out of my range!
Best,
Brandon
i love the case, lugs & dial...
and the rattrapante, the movement - what not to love actually ?!
i wish it was twin counter on the dial but then that is too pedantic isn't it !
gorgeous timepiece !
Best,
mahesh.,
Mmm ... in image 2 especially, the parts look like the work of a jeweller, not a watchmaker. The profile of the parts is 'wrong' and the anglage is particularly poor. Caveat emptor! [nt]
No message body
Good eye
Do you mean that the whole surface is polished, instead of the 45 degree angle on the edge?
If I'm wrong, can you explain it?
If I'm wrong, can you explain it?
Hi, the whole surface is black polished, that is very, very good, not bad. [nt]
No message body
I'm curious about your comment about anglage, could you please explain?
Here is what SJX says:
"And then all of the parts, new and old, are decorated by hand to a degree comparable to the most prominent names in independent watchmaking, like Voutilainen for instance"
Most would agree, so I want to learn your view.
"And then all of the parts, new and old, are decorated by hand to a degree comparable to the most prominent names in independent watchmaking, like Voutilainen for instance"
Most would agree, so I want to learn your view.
I'm going to ask for clarification here, as I don't happen to agree...
Why do you state "the anglage is particularly poor" when you are examining their work from photos? Are you a watchmaker or otherwise involved in the watchmaking world as a fine hand finisher of watch parts ,with which to pass judgement so damning as you consistently do when it comes to AdC ?
I've observed your consistent denigration and decided that it was time to question your motives here? Yes, I realize one's personal taste of finishing styles is often a determining factor as to whether or not a person likes it. To state an opinion and end it with "Caveat emptor" sends a pretty strong message that you don't believe the item in question is honest and worthwhile. If that's your opinion, as it seems to be with regards AdC, my question to you is how & why do you come to this?
As I mentioned previously 10months ago, I have visited their atelier in Barcelona, handled 3 of their early pieces and had a chance to look at them closely with a view to understanding what they are doing and more importantly for me, why create these 1950's styled contemporary watches in an artisanal Independent Watchmaking way. I came away duly impressed and with a sense of their wanting to showcase Moebius Rassman's talent combined with their sense of style and taste. While I can agree it isn't original work per se, in terms of designing a movt. from scratch, there is creative talent in designing their bridge work and certainly the hand finishing is excellent by standards out there in the fine Independent Watchmaking world that I inhabit.
Cheers,
Tim
I've observed your consistent denigration and decided that it was time to question your motives here? Yes, I realize one's personal taste of finishing styles is often a determining factor as to whether or not a person likes it. To state an opinion and end it with "Caveat emptor" sends a pretty strong message that you don't believe the item in question is honest and worthwhile. If that's your opinion, as it seems to be with regards AdC, my question to you is how & why do you come to this?
As I mentioned previously 10months ago, I have visited their atelier in Barcelona, handled 3 of their early pieces and had a chance to look at them closely with a view to understanding what they are doing and more importantly for me, why create these 1950's styled contemporary watches in an artisanal Independent Watchmaking way. I came away duly impressed and with a sense of their wanting to showcase Moebius Rassman's talent combined with their sense of style and taste. While I can agree it isn't original work per se, in terms of designing a movt. from scratch, there is creative talent in designing their bridge work and certainly the hand finishing is excellent by standards out there in the fine Independent Watchmaking world that I inhabit.
Cheers,
Tim
These are fair questions, and there is a history of very harsh criticism which is fairly noted. [nt]
No message body
100% agree. Ever since I saw the KV tear drops I have always wanted a watch with them. [nt]
No message body
First time I have ever seen this watch. That is a lot of watch! Absolutely beautiful piece. [nt]
No message body
A bit thick, but it seems very interesting with a ver good level of finishings. [nt]
No message body
Wow, that looks super nice. Just finished reading the article by SJX...
and it seems a 2 register model would be around 70.000 euros which seems reasonable for a one-off rattrapante chrono with such artisanal work.
Looks amazing at first glance...my only 2 issues:
1) balance cock seems too angular and poorly styled relative to the rest of the sensual movement. Should have been more curved/sensual.
2) thickness. Not sure of the specs, but it looks massively thick.
yes, quite possibly. Bezel height has a disproportionate effect on visual thickness. [nt]
No message body
That's the thing which bugs me a bit, here. For the rest, it is really nice. [nt]
No message body