Having three or more sources shows neither originality nor a character of it's own
By: Park : May 25th, 2020-11:57
I'd find it derivative if a watch brand were to adopt the entirely plagiarized slogan: "To break the rules you must first master them so as to create one of not many and provide a crown for every achievement." Credits: Audemars Piguet, Vacheron Constantin, Rolex. I don't disagree about the Alpine Eagle, which is also attractive. Park
I like them, too, as they've used lots of my favorite design cues. They seem to have done a fine job of mixing and matching. It's just that innovation requires more. Park
Inner bezel very similar to the most recent IWC Aquatimers, the metal between the crowns are reminiscent of Enicar. Derivative, yes... but at least they are deriving their pieces from nice looking watches.
Wempe has its own design features. Why suddenly plagiarise others'? Or is Wempe aiming at a new, unexposed market? Whatever, these watches make little sense. [nt]
I've looked at these Wempes again and each time my mind shouts the name of another brand. It shouldn't do that. The borrowed design cues are just too strong to ignore. [nt]