WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

 




Here, too, all components are thoroughly checked, not just samples. The care for all details is evident in all departments I am led through. Really impressed, though, I was by the sight of the complex mechanism of Bucherer's unique "Patravi TravelTec" multi-time zone watch. This innovation bridges two watch components that are normally fully separate from each other: the movement and the case. The large chronograph is currently the most flexible GMT watch, permitting both, a quick adjustment of the main hour hand to a different local time zone, and a quick-setting of the independent 24 hours-hand to another distant time zone. Part of the complex mechanism necessary to assure flawless operation had to be transferred into the case itself, which also explains the large dimensions of this watch: It simply could not have been made smaller than the 46.6mm diameter it possesses.






The Patravi TravelTec's casework includes part of the complex GMT mechanism




Testing of the TravelTec's case-mounted GMT-setting mechanism


Well, how can I summarize my impressions from this day I spent at the two CFB facilities? Originally, I had some mixed feelings about the launch of the Carl F. Bucherer brand. While being aware of the role and importance of the Bucherer watch and jewel shops, I had nevertheless not enough knowledge to honor the long tradition of Bucherer as a watch manufacturing company. Consequently, I made the same mistake as many of my fellow watch enthusiasts, considering the "new" brand a typical "me too"-product, trying to profit from the luxury timepiece bubble that built up in the years after 2000.




Patravi ChronoGrade, Patravi TravelTec and ChronoGrade in 18k pink gold (from left)


However, what I encountered was far from one of the many brands that were initiated with the major purpose of producing a maximum of turnaround in a minimum of time, even if this means that the brand will be short-lived. I found a brand with more parallels to my personal favorite watch manufacturers than I could believe at first: Like most of my favorite brands, Carl F. Bucherer is independent, not a subsidiary of a large luxury conglomerate with its somewhat anonymous structure. Like some of my favorite brands, Carl F. Bucherer is led by a patriarch, in its positive sense. These company patriarchs stand behind their companies. They consider them major achievements of their lives, and want to preserve them for posterity. Sustainability is their major dogma, and they do everything to keep the company structure intact and independent. Workforce fluctuation normally is low in these companies, and also the profits are mostly reinvested. Since the majority of shares is in the hands of the patriarach and/or his family, shareholder happiness does not dictate the strategic decisions.

I know that small companies like these are the nightmare of financial analysts and investment gurus, but I like them.

Additionally, the development of the watch industry during the past years has shown an interesting issue: New inventions, innovative technologies and materials, have been introduced mainly by these small and mid-sized companies, while the giants are remarkably slow in adapting themselves to what seems to be the future development of the market: to be more service-friendly, to offer new and reliable movements that will flawlessly work through extended times, new and innovative complications that are both reliable and easy to use. I realized that Carl F. Bucherer is part of that invaluable dynamics of innovative small and medium-sized, independent manufacturers that will guarantee the future of modern mechanical timepieces.




Nice monopusher chronograph with a manual-winding movement made by LJP. Originally, it was developed by F.P. Journe for Ulysse Nardin and Franck Muller





Manero MonoGraph Ladies chronograph


In this respect, my visit at Sainte-Croix and Lengnau opened my eyes, and I hope that my report will help doing the same to those readers who thought: "Carl F. Bucherer? Just one of those wannabees."

 


 

Copyright December 2009 - Marcus Hanke & PuristSPro.com - all rights reserved

PuristSPro Homepage 

Comments, suggestions, and corrections to this article are welcome.   

 
 
This message has been edited by AnthonyTsai on 2010-01-01 22:21:27 This message has been edited by ThomasM on 2010-01-04 19:24:25
login to reply

"The more you look . . .

 
 By: Dr No : January 1st, 2010-22:40
. . . the more you see."  Thanks, Marcus, for broadening my perspective on this intriguing manufacturer that's been at the margins of the watch world far too long . . . happy New Year, Art
login to reply

Marcus, Very insightful vistit to CFB!

 
 By: DRMW : January 1st, 2010-23:44
Hello marcus,

Thanks for the photos and insights into CFB.  IMO, the A1000 peripheral rotor is very unique and will be on my 2010 purchase list!

-MW
login to reply

Very rich reading Marcus

 
 By: Dje : January 2nd, 2010-00:37
Hi Marcus,

Thank you for your article.

As you I didn't know all that historical background behind the Bucherer watches and didn't know much more about their current watches.

I didn't know either what THA had become.

About that pic:



That picture reminds me that this specific calibre was indeed created by Francois-Paul Journe (the man) and AFAIK Vianey Halter when they were reunited under THA. So that may be still produced by THA? You mention LJP but I don't know what LJP is.

Anyway your article shows Bucherer as an interesting watch manufacture. I'll have a look at their in-house calibre when possible.

Thank you very much.

Cheers

Dje
login to reply

LJP stands for Lajoux Perret?

 
 By: amanico : January 2nd, 2010-00:46

Hi, Jerome and Marcus,

Yes, this caliber reminds me something, but I thought it was a Jaquet movement, modified by FP Journe himself.

Now, I'm a bit lost with LJP...

Thanks for the great reading!

Best,

Nicolas This message has been edited by amanico on 2010-01-02 03:11:20
login to reply

LJP = Jaquet before. [nt]

 
 By: foversta : January 2nd, 2010-01:26
No message body
login to reply

Thewatch world is a small one ...

 
 By: Marcus Hanke : January 2nd, 2010-02:09
Yes, this movement had been developed by THA, paid by UN and FM. SEries production was executed by Jaquet-Baume, since at that time, to my knowledge, THA did not have the possibilities for series production. Jaquet-Baume has been refounded under the name LaJoux-Perret (LJP) sine.

Regards,
Marcus
login to reply

Dang! Crystal clear, now, Marcus. Thanks! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 2nd, 2010-03:12
No message body
login to reply

That's it, and used by Cartier and GP too! nt

 
 By: Dje : January 3rd, 2010-11:57
nt
login to reply

I think the Cartier is different ....

 
 By: Marcus Hanke : January 4th, 2010-13:14
We had this issue in a discussion here some time ago, and I recall the finding that Cartier's monopusher movement is different from the THA.

Regards,
Marcus
login to reply

you reopened my eyes

 
 By: aldossari_faisal : January 2nd, 2010-00:45

First of all I would seriously love to thank you , I so love the way you build you article, report or whatever you want to call it, truly I admit I longed to continue your report word after word, line after line not because of my love for watches , but above that due to your  smooth, delicate yet simple and capturing way of writing.

 

  Again thanks, for enriching me with the history of the brand ,  and more about their delicate and dedicated way of work. This effort to create better , more improved and innovative movements which technically serves the watch making ART.

 

 Some would assume this endless effort of those brands to come out with new and better movements is a part from a strategic plan to widen there client base , which is partially true but at the same time these people are aiming to do so by serving the art they dedicated their living to.

 

  I do welcome a watch making brand capturing me as a new client or getting me to the point of loyal client by the way Carl F. Bucherer , at least these people are not fooling me by changing the color of the stitching on a strap , the straps color….. and a general color changes goes on to the watch and the name it edition X , new color combination  will be called edition Y. and the  list goes on. And what I love about them they are all LIMITID EDITIONS, sorry but what a scam.

 

 Im a true watches lover, im a true watch art taster , I do believe we've reached to a point where those tycoon brands are controlling not even the markets but the minds of people.

 

 Your report and Carl F. Bucherer  work make me ask  myself again a question I've asked several times, should I , should every real watch lover boycott those big brands , who does mass production, who charge loads of money for a time piece they spent less time working on compared to an independent or family owned brands.

 

   Im SO close to the point ill stick to independents and brands alike leaving behind and forgetting mass producing brands.

 

 Faisal

login to reply

Dear Faisal, I understand your feelings ...

 
 By: Marcus Hanke : January 2nd, 2010-08:04
First of all, let me thank you for your kind compliment, which I certainly do not deserve. My English is far from what I would like it to be, my sentences are long and clumsy, my grammar is bad. What I could easily express in my mother-language German, becomes a difficult jigsaw-puzzle of words and phrases when I try to do the same in English. I will never reach the level of most others here, which sometimes depresses me. I fear my plans to write a best-selling novel in English, about an insane watchmaker who surrounds himself with half-intelligent automatons full of wheels and levers will never be realised ..... by the way, I fear that idea is nowhere near new as well ....

Regarding your feelings about the "big companies": I understand you, and to a certain extent share your emotions. However, please do not dismiss the "giants" entirely as blood-thirsty profit-hunters. In fact, without them, without Rolex, Breitling, the Swatch Group and the others, the whole industry would be dead already. They offer the space for the independents and small, family-owned companies to dwell in. The latter depend on the infrastructure of suppliers, think-tanks, specialsts, and the industrial background of the "big ones". There is no independent watchmaker who is able to produce a series of timepieces on which he makes everything himself: his own wheels, his own springs, his own rubies, gaskets, sapphire crystals, crowns, screws, cases, dials, hands, buckles, straps.Even if he could, the costs of these components, produced in tiny series only, would be so astronomically high, that no serious economic calculation could be done for the price of such an individual timepiece. All those watchmakers depend on suppliers specialised on the production of crystals, cases, dials, and so on. However, these specialists could never survive but on the tiny numbers ordered by the independents. They need the large orders from the "giants", and only these offer enough profit that can be invested into research and new materials.

There is a simple evidence confirming my assumption: Look at Japan, a country where the traditional division of labour in the watch industry never existed. There never were legions of small and large companies specialised on making dials, cases, crystals, straps. Consequently, whoever wanted to build watches had to make all these components himself. And the only way to finance this concentration reasonably is to start full-scale mass production. Thus it is somewhat an irony that the only two watch producers who really fulfil even the strictest definition of "in-house" watch manufacturing are also the ones with the highest production figures: Seiko and Citizen. If you press the "Start"-Button of their production lines, immediately followed by "Stop", you are likely to have produced already more watches than the entire annual production of our cherished independents or family-owned brands.

The industry is complicated, and we have to be thankful for all those buying watches from the "giants". They make it possible that we can enjoy the dynamics and horological richness of our "dwarves".

Best regards,
Marcus
login to reply

again thank you

 
 By: aldossari_faisal : January 2nd, 2010-08:43

  again i would like to really thank you for reminding me of what I've forgotten. and no matter how you evaluate your writing style still captures me.

 

  Faisal

login to reply

Thanks a lot Marcus for this very comprehensive report. [nt]

 
 By: foversta : January 2nd, 2010-01:27
No message body
login to reply

Thanks for the report Marcus. [nt]

 
 By: SJX : January 2nd, 2010-04:11
No message body
login to reply

Thank you Marcus

 
 By: Quan : January 2nd, 2010-05:00

login to reply

thanks for this very informative report

 
 By: donizetti : January 2nd, 2010-05:22

I learnt a lot. I still don't like the look of the watches but I certainly now have a lot of respect for the brand, which I previously thought was little more than a fashion brand.

Best

Andreas

login to reply

It is always enjoyable to read your post, Marcus.

 
 By: ling5hk : January 2nd, 2010-07:37

Carl F. Bucherer certainly has its own well-deserved merits.

Interestingly, I noticed that the watchmaker in CFB wore shorts and sandals to work!

Regards

Ling

login to reply

Thank you Marcus for this great article

 
 By: AnthonyTsai : January 2nd, 2010-11:30

I was not aware at all of the actual real history behind CFB.  You have done a great job bringing the legitimacy of the brand to us and that CFB is not just another "wannabee".

The dials of the new CFB watches have never really been my cup of tea but I hope someday they will release a watch that fancies my eye.  That way I will be able to appreciate the what they do and represent even more.

Your article has opened my eyes to this brand.  Thank you for the excellent and well-written prose which is very fluid and easy to read for me.

Cheers,
Anthony

login to reply

CFB is destined for great things. Theyve got a very serious

 
 By: ThomasM : January 2nd, 2010-11:48
And passionate CEO; Technical Director; Marketing Director; et al.

They've got a sound technical base.

Their distribution groundwork is being laid (though it still has some ways to go for the top down message and passion to filter down)

I am looking forward to watching the company and its products develop.

Thank you, Marcus, for given us a deeper, broader picture of this promising new brand.

TM
login to reply

More about beavers.......

 
 By: MTF : January 2nd, 2010-23:37



Dear Herr Prof Dr Hanke,

Thank you for the detailed report and history of C.F. Bucherer brand and their new facilities. 

Despite spending hours at both the PuristS' Hong Kong and Taipei events with C.F.Bucherer, I did not know some of the details you revealed:  "Bucherer/Crédos were third among the manufacturers entering chronometers for observatory tests. 15,000 chronometers were leaving the production facility every year!"

 Taipei PuristS report: click here

Hong Kong PuristS report: click here

 

The watch that caught my eye although it is not the A1000 movement.



Thank you for the inside look at the quick-set pusher mechanism, in your report.

 

Regards,

MTF

This message has been edited by MTF on 2010-01-02 23:38:03
login to reply

Thanks, Marcus!

 
 By: dxboon : January 2nd, 2010-23:49

What an enlightening article!  I especially appreciated how you took some time to photograph the factory in situ.  Sainte-Croix looks like a charming place.  Documenting the locale and providing some company history really helps me to appreciate CFB more.  I'm excited about their new peripheral rotor, and would like to see it in person.  The movement bridges seem very angular and modern.  I'm curious what my reaction will be to seeing the new Evo Tech DayDate in person.  I am a little skeptical about the rubber bezel.

As usual, a great, informative article from you.  I enjoyed reading it very much.

Cheers,

Daos

login to reply

I felt clueless myself at first....

 
 By: Marcus Hanke : January 3rd, 2010-08:29
... regarding the EvoTec on the pictures. While I have not really a problem with rubber bezels, I thought the whole watch might apeear a bit too cheap. However, it was another positive surprise during the visit: This watch fits perfectly, it is comforgable, easy to read, a weekday complication is very useful, and the full piece looks just very, very attractive.

I am sure you will like it!

Kind regards,
Marcus
login to reply

Thanks for the post, Marcus. Does the shock test only ...

 
 By: Kong : January 3rd, 2010-06:33
in one axis, i.e face up/down? 

Kong

login to reply

If In recall correctly, it is possible to mount the movement ....

 
 By: Marcus Hanke : January 3rd, 2010-08:26
... in other positions as well. You might recall some arguments that the peripheral rotor is said to be more prone for damage from shocks. While this might have been true for the predecessors by Patek, Longines etc. decades ago, but CFB has done a lot of research and testing to avoid such problems. The unique G-shock test rig is part of that effort. Now I even think that the new A1000 movement could become the perfect engine of a heavy-duty sports watch.

Regards,
Marcus
login to reply

Two unique features were built-in ...

 
 By: Kong : January 3rd, 2010-19:55
to tackle shock according to CFB literature.

Marcus, thanks for the reply.

For the peripheral rotor,  shock on the rotor is addressed with a roller/ball bearing units and two special screws, while the regulating unit with their
Central Dual Adjusting System (CDAS).  Will be nice if CFB has some test results to show or sent in for Chronometry competition.

Look forward to your more indept A1000 report.

Kong

login to reply

Marcus, this is a very important article...

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : January 3rd, 2010-08:52
as it demonstrates how smaller manufacturers, often overlooked, contribute to horology with proprietary, refreshing solutions. This story demonstrates that it pays off to keep an open eye and look off the trodden paths.

I congratulate you to your successful discovery story.

Thanks,
Magnus

P.S.: I know what you mean with trying to express yourself in a foreign language. But sometimes I have difficulties to try to explain what I do for a living in my mother tongue...
login to reply

Thank you, Magnus ....

 
 By: Marcus Hanke : January 4th, 2010-14:10
... this is our mission: Inform about the important role of the "small ones". I feel that the tenedency towards concentration within big luxury groups, as witnessed during the last decade, might have passed its apex already. Now, the flexibility of the smaller companies might be playing a more dominant role.

Regards,
Marcus
login to reply

fascinating read, thanks!

 
 By: ei8htohms : January 3rd, 2010-10:59
And I very much look forward to your technical article on the Cal. 1000. smile
login to reply

I will have difficulties to meet your standards, I fear ....

 
 By: Marcus Hanke : January 4th, 2010-13:12
... as you are aware of myself being neither a watchmaker nor an engineer. I have been supplied with ample information on the cal. A1000, but I am unable to independently evaluate it. All I can do - when I get that EvoTec - is subjecting the watch to various conditions of (ab)use and look if the movement shows any flaws, or does what is shall do. The good thing is that all my questions dealing withpotential problems of the peripheral rotor design were answered in detail, and I had the impression of the technicians and movement designers that these issues have been resolved to their satisfaction.

Having read your earlier comments, I think I have an idea where the earlier concepts had their flaws. But these have been made with the goal to create extremely thin selfwinding movements, as was the current design trend back then. Backed by the acceptance of large timepieces, the Bucherer movement designers hve the luxury of ample space to dedicate for measures to optimise efficiency and countering the adverse effects of mass inertia and bumps. Consequently, I have the impression that today, it is possible to make a well-functioning peripheral rotor, which opens some new dimensions in movement design, just think about the "stacking" of modules.

Regards,
Marcus
login to reply
Load More Comments >>