I see your point...I think the power reserve looks fine and distinguishes it more from the 'regular' datograph. And for a double split, the power reserve may be more useful to make sure you have the stored energy required to time your 2 events simultaneou
I too have flirted with buying the Double Split for many years - and have held and worn it several times - but never pulled the trigger. Reflecting upon this, I have concluded that - for me at least - the watch is a bold masterpiece of movement-making but
I have mixed feelings on the Double Split. I love the concept and the movement, I want to love the watch, and thought about getting one more than once. The power reserve indicator is the detail which bugs me. I would have preferred a big date, instead. A
For reference, my wrist is 7.08” (18cm). For me, it was quite similar to the Double Split and Lange 31 when I tried them on: mechanically captivating and gratifyingly heavy - but just too big to wear proportionately and safely (ie. without clanging it int
the original Dato is an icon and aspirational as you say but it just isn't for everyone. For me (simple person that I am) it ended up just feeling a tad too small especially after I bought the Double Split. The Datograph Perpetual hits the sweet spot for
In fact, in the early 2000's, it posed quite a design challenge for Lange. The long seconds hand kept fluttering - and this was something Lange could simply not accept. Accordingly, after trying several mitigating options but not being happy with the resu
1) PP are very wearable and this aspect is often looked upon when compared to others. People mentioned ALS, so I'll use it as an example. We all praise Lange double split and triple split for the insane innovations and craft. But these watches are 15 mm t