WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Featuresexpand_more
Spotlightexpand_more
Featured Forumsexpand_more
Brand Forumsexpand_more
Independent Brandsexpand_more
Lifestyleexpand_more
Resourcesexpand_more

OMEGA Chronograph caliber 321 THE MOON WATCH and it's iconic mesh strap

OMEGA SPEEDMASTER cal 321 and Jacoby Bender USA. mesh bracelet The Omega Speedmaster was officially qualified by NASA on March 1, 1965, for all crewed space missions and became standard issue for astronauts during the Gemini, Apollo, Skylab, and Apollo-So
16d
By: hmmmcamu
6
hmmmcamu
498

145012-67 cal 321

Over the moon
2M
By: Concord
12
Dr No
623

145.012-67 in the photo

I believe is to high light the TEAR DROP end seconds sweep hand ... as oppose to the straight end long triangular seconds sweep hand .. both of which were used on 145.012 I only crop part of the article
1Y
By: hmmmcamu
3
hmmmcamu
1498

The B&W picture is a CB case so ref 105.012, made in 1967

Collins watch was indeed a 145.012 www.watchprosite.com
1Y
By: hmmmcamu
3
hmmmcamu
1498

Omega Speedmaster Chronograph ref. 145.012-68

Michael Collins Apollo 11 Command Module Columbia spent 8 days, 3 hours, 18 minutes and 35 seconds in space with Collins at the helm. HOOK and LOOP velcro strap in the photo was manufactured by NASA internally and was not supplied by Omega. NASA Bracelet
1Y
By: hmmmcamu
3
hmmmcamu
1498

The classic field wasn't broad this month . . .

. . . but man, was it ever deep! Not one but two spectacular Speedies, Abel's . . . . . . and Cap's desirable CB-case 145.012. Dr No approves highly of both. jml's JLC . . . . . . has long been one of No's favored vintage pieces on account of its futuris
1Y
By: Subexplorer
46
Subexplorer
14043

KIZZI velcro Hook and Loop THE MOST AUTHENTIC NASA WATCH STRAP using original matériel

THE MOST AUTHENTIC NASA WATCH STRAP using original matériel made by a TRUE enthusiast ...​ Kizzi Precision Flightgear - Originally for the Mercury program no single watch was identified as the approved time-piece and for whatever watch was worn a simple a
2Y
By: hmmmcamu
4
amanico
1655

Last batch . . .

. . . of photos; which can you identify? R S T U V W What I can say with a high degree of probablity is that there were examples of 2915, 2998, 105.002, 105.003, 105.012, and 145.012 present. There are some obvious models here, but others will require inf
3Y
By: Dr No
11
S F
2618

Ah, now I get the point of your question. No, expense was not the main reason driving . . .

. . . my decision for the re-issue, Nicolas. In the abstract, an original 2915 / 2998 / 105.002 / 105.003 / 105.012 / 145.012 would have been preferable. But because Omega made an effort to resurrect the legend, which was a gesture to the collector commun
4Y
By: holdemchamp1225
51
amanico
7466