It looks half baked. Gerald Charles looked like they made a better shaped perpetual calendar for their new model. Cubitus as a whole feels like half baked. Anyways, i am not the market for the cubitus. I dont feel its “authentic”. But if they used the rectangular manual wind 10 day movement in a cub
and I got drawing, figure and a pencil sharpener. It is hard to describe the feeling. I have spent a lot more on other brands but the small tokens really make you feel valued or part of something. I know its marketing and part of the cost of the watch (cynical) but it really adds appreciation to the
I was on the fence if i was going to buy the in line perpetual. But when i saw your strap, i quickly pirchased one. That strap is perfect for that perpetual! Francis
I was expecting a whole new line and maybe a shaped movement. If they said it would be a Nautilus 2.0 or maybe nautilus2 (squared). Then the watch is totally fine. The only criticism would be maybe a little too big for some (including my wrist). Francis
I posted this in the other thread but i think it would be more fit in this thread. I was hoping for a shaped peripheral rotor. Then people who buy for movements wont have problems with the look or the dimensions of this cubitus. I would line up for one if it had a new movement and not a shaped movem
I was hoping for a new movement for the cubitus collection. Maybe a Peripheral rotor. I think Patek produced peripheral movements before. The 240 is used to much and i hoped it would only be used for the higher end pieces. Francis
Why make another line if you had the gondolo. The pagoda is also a good benchmark. Patek is so rich in history. Lastly, is this a grab for Cartiers market? I do hope they made complications or movements for the line. Francis