My Posts

nt

if people ask if it's real or not. If one is not crazy about a watch, for themselves, that's fine. But to be influenced out of a watch because of what others think............hmmm................... If I judged my passion for timepieces by what others thought, I'd be miserable. Just my two cents.

but from what I've heard and understood, JLC has no interest in divulging production numbers from decades ago. We're left to extrapolate based on the data points we see in reality. For me, e-B*y has been about the best source for voluminous data. Even some of the rare Atmos I iterations have shown u

NT

what year, and what caliber? Thanks, Eric

Realizing mine is only a sample of one, and 58 years old, I have heard some reknowned Atmos experts note that the Atmos should run within 30-60 seconds per MONTH. Well, that is certainly doable, but NOT on a sustained basis, as paradoxically, the very trigger that provides the stimulus for the Atmos

just responded to the Skeleton Clock post below, but reposting here since that post is about to roll to next page......... From 1951, 100% original, an extremely rare iteration due to the combination of it being rhodium plated and the regulator knob facing towards the FRONT of the clock. I think JLC

From 1951, 100% original, an extremely rare iteration due to the combination of it being rhodium plated and the regulator knob facing towards the FRONT of the clock. I think JLC only did a small run of these front facing regulator knobs, so when you cross that with the uncommon rhodium plated, and f