WatchProSite|Market|Digest

A. Lange & Söhne

That assumes boutiques were intended to compete with ADs.

 

Rolex and Patek at least have a level-ish playing field - they are all AD's, no brand boutiques. AP, Journe, many brands are transitioning out of ADs and going boutique only. Opposite sales retail models but at least they are committed to a strategy. Traditionally boutiques like flagships were intended as brand marketing efforts, they could be profitable, or not, but they don't usually compete directly with ADs since that's not going to be good for anyone. What Lange is doing by tiering the product assortment is one way to distinguish the ADs from the boutiques - e.g. ADs get X, boutiques get X and Y. I'm all good with this, many brands do it, and then ADs can discount X and boutiques can get customers that want Y. I'm good with that, that sounds like fair play to me.
What Lange is doing is however more half baked. By introducing the application piece process which is only valid for boutique purchases, they are kicking customers to the curb that may have a long history of Langes purchased at ADs and they are kicking ADs in the nuts because they are telling customers that AD purchases don't mean anything. That sucks. BUT the kicker is they haven't pulled the AD licenses, they want to keep them too, so customers can continue to buy at ADs, not get recognized by the brand, and the customer pain continues. They wimped out. If they were playing from a position of strength they would have followed AP and FPJ and done a cutover to a boutique only model which would have left a few customers behind but at least it would be a short term transition. Instead it feels like they are going halfsies because they want to go boutique only but aren't strong enough to do so and now have created a pretty ugly middle ground for customers and ADs with no real solution in sight.

  login to reply
💰1849 Marketplace Listings for Rolex