He he 😁. You're obliged to take into account both the longitude and the mean solar time

Triple date and equation of time (detailed in the thread) complications... but not gathered in the same watch here (the ref. 26003 would have been more appropriate). The latter was too heavy to bring it back with me 😊

By: Alkiro1 : July 9th, 2017-09:47

Little English translation: The face shows local solar time which is different from the "official" time of the watch. In order to find wristwatch time again, you have to add 35 minutes more or less a correction depending on the day which is given by the o...

Audemars Piguet

Triple date and equation of time (detailed in the thread) complications... but not gathered in the same watch here (the ref. 26003 would have been more appropriate). The latter was too heavy to bring it back with me 😊

Interesting, like the graph, it depicts the EOT well

Absolutely CC

Thanks! Now I need to find me a GP 1966 EOT :) [nt]

I know why. Mine few years ago. A big regret to be honest (sorry for the creepy shot)

Oops little bug. If a moderator can delete this answer please. Thank you

Another......

Even better John

Oh Wow!.....

You're welcome my friend 😉

I thought I understood EOT.

It's a constant which is related to your positioning on earth (latitude vs Greenwich as reference). For instance, here in Geneva, its +35 or +36mn vs Greenwich

I think so.

I don't know exactly as you have to take into account the time difference too

I found on the net that the "11h55" refers to the mean solar culmination for NY (the average time the sun is at its zenith)

You're forcing me to do research. [nt]

He he 😁. You're obliged to take into account both the longitude and the mean solar time