Hi, Sanro,
I am always open to be "enlightened."
I hate "dogma" -
"ceramic is the perfect bezel material" - BS. Anyone who has ever hit a bezel hard enough against another hard surface, worse a POINTED hard surface, will scream in pain as their "impervious" ceramic bezel cracks or shatters. So it resisted scratches better than metal; I'd rather have scratches than cracks. (yeah, yeah, any incident that would damage a ceramic bezel will also damage a metal bezel. Of course; how "repairable" each material is given a specific incident and how preferable that is, is up to the individual owner.)
It also does not "polish" as beautifully and as varied as metal, though with new machining techniques, some pioneered by AP, this limitation might change in the future.
"integrated designs are superior" - uh huh. what about serviceability? What about upgradeability?
"modular designs are superior" - sorry, not necessarily either. There are unavoidable construction issues and weaknesses (more "coupling" issues; almost unavoidable additional thickness due to the modular "carrier"; etc)
So what "answer out there" are you referring to?
Just in case you don't know, I am very familiar with the "engineering elegance" argument for integrated designs. So how many "integrated designs" have you worked on, and had to pull your hair out, trying to upgrade/evolve? How many troublesome integrated designs have you worked on that, if it were modular, would have offered an alternative fix of just swapping out the defective modular functions?
So for me, given my admittedly limited knowledge and limited experience, I still have not heard any convincing and compelling "answers" that unequivocably conclude one is always and forever superior to the other.
Please enlighten me.
Thanks in advance,
TM