198042
169
Nicolas what a superb write-up
I missed it 8 years ago. Thanks to whoever brought it up again and to you for writing it.
Cheers from Zurich
Richard
The Tornek Rayville...
By: dxboon : January 5th, 2010-23:27
...is certainly a strong and attractive watch. Your article does a great job of pointing out the differences, and the similarities between it and the Milspec. I do think the Milspec may present more elegantly overall, due to the smaller/thinner indices, f...
My problem is that I love them all, Daos.
By: amanico : January 6th, 2010-07:44
The TR 900, of course, for the Story behind, for its maxi dial, to use a Rolex Terminology, and for the bezel, thicker. The Milspec, for its elegance, and because it was the first. It is funny that you say that, because I know some passionate collectors w...
Well, another FF, and a special one.
By: amanico : January 7th, 2010-00:38
But I already posted it, just before this post about the TR 900. But, I also got something else, yesterday... Something I was running after for a long time... By the way, there are, from time to time, some Ref 812 spotting here and there, but they are rea...
Impressive work, Nicolas,
By: E.J. : January 6th, 2010-01:26
I liked the comparison with Milspecs I, in its civilian and military version. It is clear that both watches share a similar aesthetic, adapting the TR-900 to the MilSpec I (in production when the latter Tornek saw the light). Its design, due to Mr. Tornek...
Interesting...
By: E.J. : January 6th, 2010-10:30
I´m thinking about it for a long time. Your theory is simply credible. If we reach the dates, we can see that the first FF were made in the earliest ´50 (1953 to be more precise). Between 1953 and 1960 the Ff knew more variations, and in those variations ...
I have some doubts, Emilio
By: amanico : January 6th, 2010-22:35
How can we be sure that the Milspec was released in 1960 and not a bit before, like 1958 or 59...? Was the Milpspec the first and the only one to use the moisture indicator? Certainly not the only one, but the first? NB: I don't know who to credit nor to ...
I have to correct one point in my last post...
By: E.J. : January 7th, 2010-14:23
when I said: The moisture indicator didn´t appear in any Ff since 1960, with the Milspec, like in the Bulova (one year before, aprox). Here are some proofs... *LIP Blancpain, 1954-1956, 34mm, AS 1361. LIP Blancpain, 1954-1956, militar model of the CIEPM, ...
Hi Stephan,
By: amanico : January 6th, 2010-22:17
As for the bezel, it is not unidirectional, and yes, you have to press on it to turn it. You have a point when you say that it is rarer than a Vintage Bond Rolex. As for the Vintage Pannies, if you take them all, yes the TR 900 is rarer. Now, if you want ...
Yep, Filip
By: amanico : January 7th, 2010-13:40
The embarss of the choice, indeed. No need to go on such a scarce piece, a simple early FF will also bring you a lot of pleasure. And even in the Milspec family, there are so many to fall in love with! One day, maybe... Best, my friend. Nicolas
A few additional points...
By: camfam : January 14th, 2010-13:35
Outstanding review! Perhaps the best out there. Some reviews of this watch have been marred by authors who own a TR-900 but have little or no hands-on knowledge of Blancpains. Your review brings a depth of knowledge that is outstanding. A couple points. F...
Thanks again, Camfam.
By: amanico : January 14th, 2010-20:24
Will open quite soon another topic about these AM FFs. I don't know, Camfam, I thought " American Military ", too, but a guy in the US, who has a certain knowledge in Military Watches, was laughting at this theory, and told me the true meaning of " NFW "....