amanico
[JLC Moderator]
404888
I totally understand your point. There are Chopard LUC movements I prefer, too.
For the pleasure of the eyes: Chopard L.U.C 1963 HERITAGE CHRONOGRAPH Steel.
Steel case, 25 pieces, from 2023. Veeeery cool one. Best, Nicolas ...
On photo, yes, in particular in this very nice shot,
but in real life, not so much, at least on my wrist and according to my personal taste... ...
For me, it’s not about the color:
this green is nice. It’s mainly about the oversized case: 42mm diameter x 14.55mm thickness (according to the official website, but the case might be a 11.50mm in reality, like the PuristS edition) is way too much for me, for such a watch (it simply doesn...
I agree!
I would add, the elevated setup of the tricompax. I will never get warm with that, despite Rolex who has started that (though sensible) trend… 🤷🏼♂️😭
On the same day, I was able to try on the titanium Perpetual Chrono,
the one you've reviewed on WatchProZine , and, though the dimensions are even bigger (45 x 15.06), I was much more impressed by it. Aesthetically, I find it to be a real stunner. But I'm still not in love with the caliber.
A truly lovely piece 👌🏻👏🏻🙌🏻
With the handwound chrono movement and without a date 👍🏻 Maybe one day but I would probably try to get the Purist version in that case 🤞🏻
That movement is amazing!
One of the best chronograph movements out there on the market! And! It's a Chopard original! As it's not a Lemania copy. AND it's got great finishing and le Poincon de Geneva or Geneva Seal!
I’ve personally never been a great fan of the L.U.C 03.07-L1’s architecture:
I find the bridges more strange than really appealing or beautiful and the levers look flat and plain to me. In real life I’ve found it unimpressive. Only my personal feeling of course.
Oui oui. Minerva is probably the best.
The Minerva Villeret definitely produces things in a more time consuming and more traditional method than Lange. Lange really has a lot of state of the art technology and modern methods.
