RJW
2922
This is very nice.
Although the aesthetics of the cut-off number 6 does not overly thrill me. Perhaps the hour markers of the previous tonneau version could have been maintained.
Regardless, I am interested in acquiring a thin/ultrathin watch at some stage and this is definitely one I will try to see.
Thanks for the post.
Regards,
Richard.
This is very nice.
By: RJW : November 9th, 2010-00:52
Although the aesthetics of the cut-off number 6 does not overly thrill me. Perhaps the hour markers of the previous tonneau version could have been maintained. Regardless, I am interested in acquiring a thin/ultrathin watch at some stage and this is defin...
Wow WG!
By: JDP : November 9th, 2010-11:32
I don't think there's a watch I prefer in WG over RG until I saw this one. Love the art deco styling and sharpness of the white gold version. I have a small wrist but it's very flat so I might be able to carry this one, especially with the turn down lugs....
Secret is ...
By: Kong : November 16th, 2010-05:01
the same, as in the beginning Looking back at it now, it is a very marvelous feat to achieve such high power-reserve in 1996 with double-stacked barrel and maintain a slender thickness for the movement. Doubt many realise this achievement. List price, wil...