VadimT
35
Absolutely agree. If you saw similar in past , it is hard to call it new now.
But I want hope that HW and other watchmakers will continue the theme with not traditional displays. On the moment this is practically blank field, but ideas simply fly and needs only to catch them.
I promise to relook at the Opus 8, as a potential customer.
For what it is worth...I have been thinking that to own one, may just add a certain "completeness" to my collection. In fact, it may boost my collection's carnival status...I mean this in the most positive light! So far, the team has been working on an ev...
You've got to be kidding me Bernard...
There are many other selections out there that could complete your collection and still add "color". You know in medicine sometimes we have to trust our instincts... Your initial instincts were so strong that I somehow doubt this would be what you spend y...
Here's why...
I had a tad more conversation with many watch people, mostly industry. I would reveal that 8 out of 9 hate the watch, and are not "with" it. But you know...I am that kind of guy that just because 1 man...and that man is from Harry Winston, but not a part ...
Yes, one of the most ambiguous watches of this year
On my vision, the main difficulties with aesthetic of watches such “digital” and “modern sci-fi” type is harmonization of asymmetrical design, what usually deals with complexity and size of mechanics. Last time I also thought about sci-fi design. And only...
It was the asking price that got to me most ..especially since the form was to be "humor".
I get the retro idea and all that..but I don't get or am convinced by the cost.
I do love this watch and .......
I really hope it is price of URWERK 103 or MB&F 2 But as for Bernard, I do see this piece fits perfectly in your collection. Lovesss*CL
As doctors, we have 4 truisms
1) When you hear bird-song, it is more likely to be a sparrow than a nightingale. (i.e. common things happen commonly) 2) If it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck and smells like a duck-shit -- then duck shit it is! (no explanation needed) 3) KISS (kee...
My dear MTF and Dr. Cheong. . .
. . . I have as you can imagine followed this thread with some interest, and without expressing an opinion on the watch, I can't quite credit that you genuinely think an anecdotal reportage of 8 out of 10 'not being with it' (whatever that means) constitu...
No comment on Opus 8
Dear Jack, Appreciate your points. My comments were NOT directed at the Opus 8 because that is already old news and as you said - commentary on subjective "liking" of a "design" is a futile exercise. My commentary was about Bernard going against his advis...
You make some excellent points unquestionably. . .
. . . I assumed, I admit, that Bernard was being rhetorical rather than literal when he said 8 out of nine surveyed disliked the watch (and my experience too has been that it is far from universally admired in some quarters, I have heard some disappointed...
my suggestion is ...
not to jump on this one Bernard. keep the dosh for something more worthy.. there are of course many more watches to come and this is a forgettable blip in horology .. and at that price... 'what were they smoking?' cheers raph
yes but what if
someone let's just for the sake of discussion say Bernard .0) one day owns all Opus pieces except 8 tormenting in the horizon just my 2HRK so my decision would be to buy even that piece I dislike just to have whole Opus collection Best
Biggest disappointment in OPUSs, well the only one as well...
Yes, I loved every of the OPUS up to the 7. Of course, some more than others, but I allways appreciateted their originality as well as technical nature. This one surely has the originality, but they might have gone slightly too far in taking some rough ea...