I can understand the need to be somewhat circumspect in your public comments, but on the other hand I read with great interest the comparative comments/impressions of people with wider experience than me.
Be it a crusty old professor that has seen more of the rare stuff just because he has been around for longer, or an audio reviewer that has listened, under controlled circumstances, to more $100K speaker systems than I have, or the car reviewer that has driven more than I have on both road and track.
Sure, I have to get to know their biases, interests, audiograms, etc.. I have to ‘road test’ some of their comments by making my own observations, which eventually leads to a level of trust in their opinion. There were audio reviewers (Sam Tellig and Jon Valin come to mind) whose ears I trusted because, on the occasions when I sampled a piece of equipment they reviewed, their comments gelled with mine. A level of trust built up. There are Purists whose comment on watches I find myself nodding in approval with, so when I read them describing a watch I haven’t handled in the metal, I sit up and take more notice.
So, I am very happy if, provided people share their biases with us, that they also tell it like they see it.
Andrew
Ps. HoMe is starting to read like WR. Who let the dogs in?