I'm going to do some more themes later. More USEFUL criteria. The goal will be to conduct mental exercises that help us to collect and enjoy watches better!
Team, we have just been discussing in the Patek forum a 2 watch only collection. I'd like to open the discussion with this question: If you could only have 2 modern watches at any cost, what would they be? This is not supposed to reflec your actual financ...
You cover a lot of uses with those two. But for the life of me I cannot see even answering this question, never mind trying to make it a reality. I'd be dead with Hororgasm.
I shall exclude both financial constraints and my recent new situation so in this theoretical exercise manual wound watches become possible again... I would then vote as modern watches for PP 5370 P + Voutilainen (my Vingt-8 as it is is fine 😀). And I wou...
And for me the most beautiful automatic movement on the market (here we are talking modern watches as per your brief is certainly the micro-rotor from Laurent Ferrier. It is a real beauty and the finishing is incredible. Of course if you also consider vin...
Only two OMG 😱 Can we add a zero please 😁 Well, I think I would go for the Romain Gauthier Logical One and a minute repeater. Why not the JLC Master Ultra-Thin Minute Repeater Flying Tourbillon 😉 Best wishes Alkiro
Hi Think I'd have to go with a 5078p with a black dial. As for my second - think I'd have to go for a JLC Reverso Duo, though would be mightily distracted by Memovoxes! Cheers JML
Did also think second watch could be something as simple & robust as a Seiko five & just wear the other on high days & holidays. Cheers JML Ps if you asked me next week it could well be a memovox
Within reason that is. Both very wearable and complement each other well. Obviously if there are absolutely no constraints whatsoever it would be possible to dream up unobtainiums, but assuming the exercise is to name two modern pieces that are somehow re...
.....the latter wins for me as it does have that dual time capacity AND it has the stunning advanced research angle too....also, its a watch that can be worn in the pool. Yep....within reasonable parameters, those two would do it for me. A truly hard prob...
I'm going to do some more themes later. More USEFUL criteria. The goal will be to conduct mental exercises that help us to collect and enjoy watches better!
For me, the two vintage would be 3448 and 1665 Mk2........the two modern would be 5370p and 5650g...... But if i had to pick only two from all....agghhhhh.....yes, torture.......but it would be: 3448 and....agghhhh.....5650g.
...and I was waiting for another to come asking the same question for 2 vintage watches only ! 2 modern + 2 vintage was hard enough, I don't think I could narrow it to 1 + 1 as mentioned in another thread... If 2 vintage only my choice would be PP 3448 + ...
it is not going to happen...it is not going to happen...it is not going to happen... Ok now, a humble manually wound pair... Reverso and 5196g Best, mahesh.,
My Hublot is a special one (Red Devil KP) so I think I'll hang on to that one for a long time. I have 2 other Hublots but one will go to my son. I think Rolex is also a 'must' but I prefer vintage Rolex to modern ones. Casio G-shocks are also good picks b...
For around town and out for dinner: For life in the water, by the beach and outdoors (a lifestyle I'd love to have a lot more of if I had the disposable income) ...
Both of the chose watches would be outside my top three if the question would be "choose 5..." However, there are complication which I would like to have if only two watches were the limit. Among those are: - Perpetual calendar - Chronograph or split-seco...
Makes for three of us so far going down the road of a 5650G... and two of this would go 5370P and you 5372P. Very similar tastes I must say... choice between 5370 and 5372 is a tough one but the black enamel Breguet dial wins over the perpetual for me but...
Just love the extraordinary complication and the engineering behind these two pieces - with the Patek a "dressy all around piece" and the RM for fun. One can dream eh? Peter
But if we consider the speedy too old, I'd opt for the new moonphase iteration Breguet 5347 in platinum my old Speedy new moonwawtch moonphase Kind regards, Max ...
I'm just a newbie, I'm not able to take into account so much brand history or philological meanings, still learining and I see this is the right place! Kind regards, Max
For instance, I didn't appreciate Picasso until I studied and understood cubism. I just was ignorant (=not educated). Now I see it's a great idea to have Pia's front and back in the same painting! So I consider myself a WI (=WIS minus the S). The process ...