bpbs
21
I looked at the UN
I knew it was a solid watch, but for some reason it just did't get me excited. I had the same reaction to the JLC Reverso Grande GMT. It was another solid watch, but it didn't feel like it was for me. Same with the GP.
I guess that's how it is often times when we look at watches (or most things in life). We try to find that balance between rational and emotional that suits us and the combination will be different for everyone. In many ways, I guess that's what I'm looking for. Can I find that balance that I can be content with just one watch? Maybe I can. Maybe I can't (so I have an excuse to look for another watch ;-)
If you could own just one watch for all occasions what would it be?
Hi Everyone, I know it might be counter intuitive for watch collectors to be asked to pick just one, but I hope you can help me out. I am trying to simplify my life. I just want to own a few things that I will enjoy (i.e. really use and not just look at)....
I like watches with specific purposes...
Honestly, I don't like the idea of the single watch for any occasion. ;) But in your selection, I would choose the Rolex without any doubt: it is the most "all-around" of the selection IMHO. Fx
Thanks for playing
The Rolex is quite solid. Anyway, I totally understand what you mean about different watches for different purposes. I guess that's part of what makes collecting fun.
Other than family heirlooms . . .
. . . or mementos, there's one watch that I could wear every day . . . . . . in any situation, and never tire of. Seeing as how these Karrees are discontinued, and given your parameters, there's a new contender from Omega . . . [photo credit: Magnus / Oli...
I'd choose the Overseas...
...even though the Rolex would be the obvious choice, just because the VC is less common out in the real world. But I guess you could say that about your other choices, too. Emil
Do oranges grow on apple trees?
All occasions? You fool! It does not exist. Why limit one self to one single watch when there are so many wonderful watches out there? I know you cannot have them all, but you could at least get one that you really like? Repectfully, best- Z'
Yes, but considering that most of the world wears only one watch...
...and that's those that do wear watches ,the Rolex among those choices seems the clearer choice for me, but not for the brand perception, but for the adaptive styling that works with jeans, shorts or suit. It's why they sell so doggone many of these ever...
Unlike the others
I totally understand the idea of only one watch. But what a terribly difficult decision. Given your existing five choices I would definitely go with the Rolex GMT. However, I can't imagine how painful it was to get down to the last five. -- Sancerre
I am a big fan of...
...the VC OS, as I feel as if it is a watch that can be worn over a long period of time without wondering at some point "what did I find attractive about that piece in the first place?" The limitation as a GMT watch is the single hand on the second time z...
As I don't travel very often.............
Or wear a suit. My choice is for a tool watch that would live up to my lifestyle. And so my choice is Sub, but not a new model but vintage. Such as my lovely 5512 :) And all I would do to change its appearance is fit it with another strap :) Regards Tony ...
I totally agree with your statement.
There are more than one watch, at GP, which could be an " only one watch ". Depending on your lifestyle... Best, Nicolas
That's easy for me...
I know that if I ever had the finances and opportunity to do so, the PP Nautilus 3711 would be the one. For you, more difficult. With the GMT function out of your choices I would rank 1) VC Overseas Dualtime and then 2) Rolex GMT Master II. Nothing agains...
You are right. It is more about the responders and their thought processes.
Thanks for the input!
Another Vote for VC
All of the watches you describe are wonderful watches and would serve you well for a lifetime. So, as you say, it's really all about personal preference. In addition, though, some people (few probably) will form opinions of you based on your watch. Many p...
Hahaha. Are you a psychologist or a poker player or something?
Your email summarizes the roller coaster journey I've been on. Yes, the VC and the Rolex are ahead of the others for me. Some days the VC is clearly ahead. Other days, it's the Rolex. The GO was an alternative I put on the list because I was intrigued but...
If I may jump in
with a personal testimonal regarding the VC Overseas...I'm very enthusiastic about their ruggedness and slim profile and have always had one or two in the quiver. Back in 2008 I wore one to the summit of a 22,800 ft. peak in South America. The current mod...
Guilty as charged...
I am actually a psychiatrist (still in training), but there's little reason to quibble. I have never owned either a Rolex or a VC Overseas, so I doubt I can tell you anything about them that you don't already know. From the post showing the VC on a mounta...
Rebel!
What's not to like about these? Well, my guess is that some folks (including my wife, by the way) find the YG version of the OS DT a bit too, shall we say, blingy -- and maybe the Deep Stream SS/Ti color combo is not exactly to your taste -- but these are...
Boring old Rolex for me too :-)
I have considered this ‘single watch’ question a lot, and it is Rolex that comes closest for me. I don’t have a GMT, but this 5513 is extremely comfortable, rugged and versatile and you would find the same with a GMT, I am certain. I agree with the recomm...
Even with my severe horofatigue
I will seriously struggle to do that but if I had to, I'd go with a GMT but with black dial as I think that will be better for slightly more formal occasions. Good luck with this near nirvana quest :-)
Either VC or Rolex....
Both a great. I like the Rolex because it is the classic GMT watch. I like the VC because of the technical looking dial and the awesome bracelet. If I could only pick one it would be the Overseas. Just curious as why the Ulysse Nardin Dual Time did not ma...
I looked at the UN
I knew it was a solid watch, but for some reason it just did't get me excited. I had the same reaction to the JLC Reverso Grande GMT. It was another solid watch, but it didn't feel like it was for me. Same with the GP. I guess that's how it is often times...
Never was an easy choice, never will be
I'm with Jon as per his post above. Having three Rolexes already (GMT II '95, DeepSea '09, Daytona TT '12), I am now looking at the Nautiluses, Royal Oaks, etc. Classic timepieces, but none can truly match the sturdiness of a Rolex. I personally see nothi...