El Padre
293
I think...
...because most brands want to boast that a watch has a tourbillon (most customers want to show that off too). However, there are people and brands that do not need to prove anything to others 😉
Hidden tourbillon?
Do you know of any watches with a hidden tourbillon? One that is invisible from the dial side? Of course, the Laurent Ferrier shown, Patek Philippe had several models, anything else? ...
Lange 1 and Dato P
The Lange 1 Tourbillon Perpetual, as well as the Datograph perpetual both have tourbillons hidden on the dial-side. I believe all other references with a tourbillon have them exposed on the dial side.
Is a key intent of a brand including a tourbillon to actually have it evident/seen?
I understand it’s function to counteract gravity effects, but why do some pieces have this function “hidden” whereas most have a clear aperture showing the tourbillon.🤔
It’s all for show. Modern movements can be set in a way to keep perfect time, without needing a power hungry Tourbillion.
In LF’s case, I believe it must be because the caseback is always the prettier side 🤣🤣
So then it makes sense that it’s for show, as I can appreciate a nice tourbillon like what we see on VCs.
And exactly as Hussam said, I couldn’t imagine the marginal impact of tourbillons on time accuracy to be so significant for that sake alone. Therefore, the technical adornment factor makes the most sense.
I think...
...because most brands want to boast that a watch has a tourbillon (most customers want to show that off too). However, there are people and brands that do not need to prove anything to others 😉
This makes sense, yes, as a sort of technical (and design) boast.
I don’t object, but it’s very confusing to me when hidden.
For me
it's a bit like clothing brands like LV, RL, Dior, Gucci, Prada, versus the quiet luxury represented by Loro Piana, Cucinelli, Bottega Venetta
G.O. Alfred Helwig Tourbillon
(Picture taken from their web site) Love the simplicity on the front site. Best, Martin ...
