passetemps
385
Longines
Dear Suitbert,
I have researched and found examples of the Longines 13ZN.
A very nice watch, and indeed, the movement is very similar in its construction to the UROFA 59, although obviously much much MUCH better finished, as it suits logically to a watch that was a luxury item, as opposed to a tool.
It is probably more important horologically (as a movement) than the UROFA 59, and the latter has certainly taken the former as a source, especially if ,as you say, the Longines patent dates back from 1936, two years before the development of UROFA 59 started.
The Flieger Chronograph is important in my view because, as a massively produced, purely utilitarian TOOL used at it was meant to be used, it has taken a nice invention to a totally different level in terms of UTILITY (not to mention the historical importance of the pieces used in the war).
I guess we are both in perfect agreement.
Regards,
Fred
A few remarks...
By: SuitbertW : March 11th, 2014-17:00
Hello, Frank, stunning collection ! Thanks a lot for sharing !!! Your love is more than obvious and personally I'm with you - it's a true beauty and certainly a true testimonial of this time. I happen to like amost all chronographs of this pioneering peri...
Longines....
By: SuitbertW : March 13th, 2014-03:24
Hello, Frank, Longines during beginning of 20th. century is just an incredible company - especially in regards of technical standards, diversity in technical and esthetical aspects.... It will be difficult to find a second company similarily involved in e...
The good things...
By: passetemps : March 13th, 2014-12:13
The good things about the Longines 13ZN is that it is an affordable watch with a very nice movement and that it is relatively easy to find. But at 35mm, the watch is not very wearable nowadays. And it's design looks a bit antiquated, at least in my opinio...
Longines
By: passetemps : March 12th, 2014-07:05
Dear Suitbert, I have researched and found examples of the Longines 13ZN. A very nice watch, and indeed, the movement is very similar in its construction to the UROFA 59, although obviously much much MUCH better finished, as it suits logically to a watch ...
Perhaps...
By: passetemps : March 12th, 2014-07:19
Perhaps documents exist about the link between both developments: the luxury item (normally found in gold) first produced in 1936 and the tool (in brass) first produced in 1940. The proximity of the dates is very interesting (to say the less)! Plus: what ...
FLYBACK
By: passetemps : March 14th, 2014-10:22
Thank you for your helpful insight. My focus is on the genesis of the first FLYBACK waterproof chronograph, with rotating bezel, luminous hands & numerals, produced on a large scale. Putting together all these separate inventions apparently happened in 19...