remarque
878
Of watches and men, with apologies to John Steinbeck...
With regard to a few recent threads, of which I have minimally perused due to lack of interest on my part, I will say thus: When people do not know how to respond intellectually, they often respond emotionally, and that emotional response is never positive...
If I do not find a watch appealing, and call it ugly, the watch does not care. The watch is inanimate, thoughtless, insensate. And by writing these last two adjectives, I am (almost) anthropomorphizing the watch.
But, if, in calling the watch ugly and perchance some other sensate person (who may or may not own that particular watch) discovers that I called the watch ugly, and that person has some vested interest in that watch, that person may take offense that I called an inanimate object ugly.
This is the emotional response (vide supra) rather than the appropriate intellectual response, which would go something like this: (?) That person has a different aesthetic sensibility than I do. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Although I may find the expression of that person's tastes/preferences/etc barbaric(?), misguided(?), uncouth(?), etc etc, it does not harm me or any other living creature, ultimately, so I will let it pass. I will not let it cause me emotional distress/turmoil/upset, I can live with it, it doesn't matter at all! Serenity now... That is all.