Lépine
1275
Small watch
Looks like it's got extract information, rare and collectible. Looks like a good watch for a collection and likely will increase in value. Go for it.
Thank you!
By: sham1 : March 11th, 2026-08:49
Interestingly, a friend of mine had commented on how ugly the Rolex was and told me to buy a proper watch like one of these instead. As the saying goes, money cannot buy class! ) ...
I never knew
By: sham1 : March 12th, 2026-00:01
that there was such a thing as endurance training research. Maybe it was spurred on after Abebe Bikila;s spectacular victory in the 1964 Tokyo Olympics. He had also won the marathon in the 1960 Olympics, both victories in a world record time.
Thank you Emmanuel
By: sham1 : March 11th, 2026-13:24
The Rolex is quite special and I have been looking for this model in mint condition for awhile now. It also costs five times more than the Longines which makes the Longines incredible value. Then again, I am a firm believer that one gets what one pays for...
Gorgeous pieces!
By: mblum3 : March 11th, 2026-17:52
When I started in watches in the early 80’s my main love was early Rolexes. It’s so rare these days to see the complete package. Here’s a cushion I used to have but in a moment of insanity I sold to a friend to finance another piece. Should have robbed a ...
😂😂
By: mblum3 : March 12th, 2026-15:02
In regard to which one to buy, if you can afford it, buy both. But only If the Longines dial has no hairlines in it. Look carefully with a loupe. Good luck and keep us posted!
I am indeed!
By: sham1 : March 13th, 2026-13:32
There is no way I can afford all three so I will have to give the matter some serious thought. This is actually one of the joys of watch collecting - not being able to afford everything and having to decide what suits us best.
By: Lépine : March 15th, 2026-20:35
Charles Frodsham looks very much like a redail. Since the other parts are off the shelf, I would avoid this kind of situation where the dial is the main identity of the watchmaker. A fake dial on the watch could mean the whole watch is a fake.
Ah I see
By: sham1 : March 16th, 2026-00:19
Well, I had sent the same photo to Richard Stenning, one of the co owners of Charles Frodsham who has confirmed that it is a rare Frodsham wristwatch from the 1950s. He had also confirmed that the case maker during that time was Dennison and the movement ...
I am lost for words!
By: sham1 : March 16th, 2026-16:04
I must commend you on your eagle eyes. I was very keen on the Frodsham due to its rarity but you have single handedly put me off purchasing this watch. And for that I must thank you because I can't afford to buy an incorrect vintage watch. I don't even us...
I am a firm believer
By: sham1 : March 17th, 2026-05:30
that one gets what one pays for so although vintage watches may seem underpriced (Patek excluded!), there is an inherent risk in buying them and we tend to forget that their prices may appear low compared to more contemporary watches but their prices are ...
Every Dealer I know
By: Lépine : March 18th, 2026-00:16
Will take back a fake watch they sold. Their entire business reputation is at risk. Others will have same experiences. The watch can be returned years later. If your dealer isn't 100% guarantee the watch, don't buy anything expensive from him.
It's a lot easier now
By: Lépine : March 18th, 2026-06:30
than when I started. Now we have the internet and can verify that the exact type of watch exists before we buy ours. Check if the dial design and print quality, markings on the case match, movement markings and serial number range all match. Compare the w...