WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Independents

It is a natural escapement and it isn't a natural escapement.

 

It's debatable.  Rolex calls it a natural escapement.  The media has called it the same as well (journalists don't generally know the true exact distinction).  While the argument can be made that it doesn't meet all the attributes of a traditional natural escapement (mainly it's not "directly driven" by the impulse itself over both wheels, but only one), over time, it's likely that the minor attributes will be forgotten and thus, the distinction will be minimized.  Thus, as a futurist, I would say we should just skip ahead and call it a natural escapement.  


While I agree with your last sentence.  I don't think natural escapements will ever truly be normalized.  Customers aren't sophisticated enough to ask for these minor details.  Customer demand and customer request drives a lot of the changes.  Or, the marketing team identifies untapped customer needs/wants and then asks engineering to integrate a feature into a future product.  And customers are never going to ask for natural escapements en masse.  So, I think we're in agreement there - although we're coming at the same conclusion from two different reasons.  

  login to reply
💰1853 Marketplace Listings for Rolex